Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: krishnaswami · Page 1 of about 4,743 results (0.502 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 28 1964

West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Deputy Superintendent, C. Ex., Dandeli

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-28-1964

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 36

Reported in : [1964]54ITR267(KAR); [1964]54ITR267(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : M. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

ORDERK.S. Hegde, J.1. This petition is misconceived for more reasons than one. The petitioner is a manufacturer of different varieties of paper. He commenced manufacturing papers in about the year 1959. One variety of paper which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1998

Shriram Chits and Investments (P)ltd., T. Nagar Vs. M. Krishnan and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-1998

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65; Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 5, 12, 14 and 64; Chits Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65, 66 and 67; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR2000Mad78; 1999(1)CTC238

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnaswami, Adv.

ORDERJudgement pronounced by E. Padmanabhan, J.1. In this writ appeal notice of motion was ordered on 24.6.1998. The respondents have entered appearance. With the consent of the counsel appearing for either side the writ appeal itself...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1958

The Coimbatore Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. Vs. M.S. Srinivasan Chart ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-24-1958

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 234(6), 234(7), 235 and 237

Reported in : AIR1959Mad229; (1959)1MLJ254

Advocate for Appellant : T.M. Krishnaswami Iyer and ;A. Balasubramaniam, Advs.;V. Thyagarajan and ;P.V. Marthandan, Advs.

ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J.1. This is a petition for the issue of a writ prohibiting the first respondent Mr. M.S. Srinivasan from holding an enquiry and conducting an investigation into the affairs of the Coimbatore Spinning and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 1953

Balasundara Mudaliar Vs. Muthuvenkatachala Mudaliar (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-1953

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order 6, Rule 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55

Reported in : AIR1954Mad799; (1954)IIMLJ141

Advocate for Appellant : K. Krishnaswami Iyengar, ;R. Aravamudha Iyengar, ;K. Srinivasan and ;S. Krishnaswami, Advs.

1. The plaintiff appeals against the dismissal of his suit O. S. No. 87 of 1947 by the Subordinate Judge of Cuddalore. This was a suit for partition and for specific performance, as an alternative relief....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1966

Venkataraman Annayya Hedge Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Sirsi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-07-1966

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 66 and 67

Reported in : [1967]64ITR555(KAR); [1967]64ITR555(Karn); (1966)2MysLJ327

Advocate for Appellant : B.V. Krishnaswamy Rao, Adv.

Somnath Iyer, J.1. The petitioner is a resident of the village of Manjaavalli in the District of North Kanara, in which he owns 8 acres and 21 guntas of agricultural land. On May 26, 1964, he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1935

J. Mciver and H. Hadow Partners Carrying on Business Under the Name an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-16-1935

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1936)70MLJ545

Mockett, J.1. This is a petition to adjudicate as insolvents Mr. J. Mclver and Mr. H. Hadow, who carry on business as partners under the name of Huson. Tod & Co., Stockbrokers in Madras. The petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1935

J. Mciver and H. Hadow of Huson Tod and Co. Vs. K.V. Al. Rm. Alagappa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1935

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1936Mad27

ORDERMockett, J.1. This is a petition to adjudicate as insolvents Mr. J. McIver and Mr. H. Hadow, who carry on business as partners under the name of Huson, Tod & Co. Stockbrokers, in Madras. The petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1965

Narayan Nagappa Hegde Vs. Shankar Narasimha Bhatta

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-1965

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 3, 5(2) and 115; ;Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 7, 23 and 23(2); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, 1874 - Sections 79

Reported in : AIR1966Kant5; AIR1966Mys5; ILR1965KAR143; (1965)1MysLJ223

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Datar

ORDER(1) The question of law that has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondent in this revision petition relate to the competence of this court to entertain this petition under S. 115 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1993

Parvej Aktar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-05-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Handlooms (Reservation of Articles for Production) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6), 39, 43 and 46; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 6; Cotton Textile (Control) Order, 1948

Reported in : JT1993(1)SC453; 1993(1)SCALE456; (1993)2SCC221; [1993]1SCR803

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.N. Krishnamani

1. The writ petition and the transferred cases challenge the validity of Handlooms (Reservation of Articles for Production) Act, 1985 (22 of 1985) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the order bearing No. DCP/BNP/l (2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1937

V.N. Subramania Iyer Vs. K.M.S.R.M. Kannappa Chetti and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-05-1937

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1938Mad38

1. This appeal arises out of a suit between a principal and his agent. The plaintiff had a cloth shop in Kumbakonam and he was also doing some money lending business there. The defendant became his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial