Advanced Search Results
South India Viscose Ltd. Vs. Cegat
Chennai
Nov-24-1994
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57F(2) and 57G
1995(77)ELT280(Mad)
Shri Krishna Srinivas and ;S. Ramasubramaniam, Advs.
ORDER1. When the petition for stay filed by the Writ Petitioner and the petition for vacating stay filed by the respondents-Department camp up for hearing, arguments were addressed at considerable length and the issues raised also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Pistons Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-08-1996
Service Tax
(1996)(63)LC570Tri(Chennai)
1. Shri Krishna Srinivas, the learned Counsel, submitted that in all the above appeals the question that arises for consideration is with reference to appellants' eligibility to claim refund without being hit by the applicability of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Addison and Co.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-07-1996
Service Tax
(1997)(93)ELT429Tri(Chennai)
1. The issue in the appeal relates to respondents' eligibility to refund in terms of Section 11B of the CEA, 1944. The respondents had claimed refund in respect of excess duty paid by them by including...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
India Pistons Limited Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madra ...
Chennai
Sep-23-1986
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 223-A; Central Excise Act - Sections 11-A; Central Excises Act - Sections 35, 35-B(2), 35-EE and 35-EE(2); Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41
1987(12)ECC243; 1987(27)ELT651(Mad)
Krishna and King and Patridge, Advs.
1. Admit. 2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It engaged inter alia in the manufacture of motor vehicle parts and accessories falling under Tariff Item No. 34A of the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Pistons Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Nov-25-1996
Excise
1999(113)ELT793(Mad)
Shri Krishna Srinivasan, Adv. for ;M/s. Ramasubramanian & Associates
ORDER1. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories, falling under Chapter No. 84.09 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGlory Jeeva Rita Vs. Executive Director, Bharat Petroleum Corporation ...
Chennai
Feb-11-2008
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 17, 22, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18 and 41; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1), 23 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2008(3)ARBLR588(Madras)
T.R. Rajagopalan, Sr. Adv. for; T.R. Rajaraman, Adv.
S. Rajeswaran, J.1. OA No. 441 of 2008 has been filed to suspend the order of termination passed by the third respondent vide Ref. TCN.LPG.JOTHI dated 18.01.2008 pending proceedings of the arbitrator.OA No. 442 of 2008...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Pistons Limited Represented by Its Director K.V. Shetty Vs. Unio ...
Chennai
Nov-25-1996
Excise
(1997)1MLJ259
Mr. Krishna Srinivas
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories, falling under Chapter No. 84.09 of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Telecommunications Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-22-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(104)LC142Tri(Chennai)
1. Both these appeals filed by Tamil Nadu Telecommunications Ltd are directed against the order in Appeal No. 4 & 5/97(M) dated 7.4.1997 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Madras. The grievance of the appellants is that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnglo-french Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Mar-15-2004
Criminal
1. In this matter Ms. Meenakshi, Advocate seeks for adjournment of the appeal as a last and final chance. It is seen from the order that this matter has been adjourned from 13.02.02 till date and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGalaxy Rubber Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Aug-31-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(82)ELT320Tri(Chennai)
1. Shri Krishna Srinivas, the learned Counsel for the appellants at the outset submitted that the impugned order of the Collector of Central Excise, Madurai, dated 28-12-1990 is violative of the principles of natural justice and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »