Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: krishan kumar · Page 1 of about 2,132 results (0.149 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 1996

Afzal and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-1996

Subject : Contempt of CourtCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 129

Reported in : AIR1996SC2326; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)183; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)199; 1996CriLJ1679; JT1996(1)SC328; 1996(4)KarLJ189; 1996(1)SCALE340; (1996)7SCC397; [1996]1SCR573

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Mehta,; U.R. Lalit,; S.B. Sanyal,;

ORDER1. FIRs were registered with Government Railway Police, Faridabad by the Station House Officer, Ambala Cantonment, Randhir Singh (ASI) against the prime accused, Rahim Khan for offences of fraud and forgery of the railway receipts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1993

S.M. Mallewar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-26-1993

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10(1), 13(3), 14, 19(1), 37, 47, 246, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305 and 326; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 23, 24-A, 52, 53, 54, 56, 136, 139(1), 143 and 144; Madras Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949; Kerala Essential Articles Control (Temporary Powers) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3; Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 58 and 59; Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act - Sections 256; U.P. Town Areas Act - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979;

Reported in : AIR1993Bom327; 2004(3)BomCR371; 1993(1)MhLj685

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Bobde, ;Sunil V. Manohar, ;C.S. Kaptan, ;Mrs. N.S. Jog, ;Miss A. Kinkhed, ;S.G. Aney, ;N.W. Sambre, Advs.

1. By these writ petitions filed under Art. 326 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have impugned the statutory notification dated the 14th of September, 1992, bearing No. BPA-1088/ 1866/EXC-3, issued by the Government of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2008

Balwan Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (2008)2PLR638

Sham Sunder, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of three criminal appeals bearing No. 598-SB of 1999 filed by Balwan Singh, 599-SB of 1999 filed by Shamsher Singh and 600-SB of 1999 filed by Krishan Kumar arising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2009

Jitender Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3347

ORDERSham Sunder, J.1. This revision-petition is directed against the judgment dated 11.10.1999, rendered by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge Bhiwani, vide which it dismissed the appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 03.03.1998 and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2012

Shri R.P.S. Panwar Vs. Union of India, Through Director (Estt), Depart ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-25-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant : R.P. Kapoor, Advocate. For the Respondents : Shri Krishan Kumar, Advocate.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): Through the instant Original Application, Shri R.P.S. Panwar - a retired ITS Officer, the applicant herein, is seeking the following main relief(s):- “8.03.That (Annexure A-1, A-2, A-3 and to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2003

Surinder Kumar Bindal Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2003

Subject : CriminalElectricity

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379

Reported in : 3(2003)CCR92; 105(2003)DLT58; 2003(69)DRJ368; 2003(2)JCC1163

Advocate for Appellant : Krishan Kumar, Adv

ORDER1. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner has already deposited the bill amount in the office of the respondent No. 2 and endorsement of the same is given on the receipt...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1985

Sunita Bhutani Vs. Sat Pal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-24-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 28(1985)DLT472

Advocate for Appellant : Krishan Kumar, Adv

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) By this petition Smt. Sunita Bhutani has challenged the legality and correctness of the order passed on 5th May, 1984, by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the monthly maintenance of Rs. 300.00...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1983

Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. T.P. Khaitan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-06-1983

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111, 155, 397, 398 and 403

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas28(Delhi); 25(1984)DLT120; ILR1984Delhi688

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Khanna and; Krishan Kumar, Advs

D.R. Khanna, J. 1. Technically speaking, this petition moved under section 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, by one Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd., has become infructuous inasmuch as the relief sought for cannot any longer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2009

Amrit Lal Seth Vs. Seth Hotels (P.) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2009(95)SCL161(CLB-NEWDELHI)

Advocate for Appellant : Amrit Lal Seth for the Petitioner. Krishan Kumar, Pradeep Kumar Kar, R.L. Garg and Anil Bhutan for the Respondent.

1. The petitioner holding 100 shares and claiming to be entitled to 20 per cent shares in M/s. Seth Hotels Private Limited has filed this petition alleging that by issue and allotment of further shares, his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2011

Mohinder Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498-A, 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 311

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Adv.

1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 6.2.1999, appellant Mohinder Kumar, husband of deceased Seema has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Section 302 IPC. As per the order on sentence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial