Advanced Search Results
Afzal and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Supreme Court of India
Jan-17-1996
Contempt of CourtCriminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 129
AIR1996SC2326; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)183; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)199; 1996CriLJ1679; JT1996(1)SC328; 1996(4)KarLJ189; 1996(1)SCALE340; (1996)7SCC397; [1996]1SCR573
B.K. Mehta,; U.R. Lalit,; S.B. Sanyal,;
ORDER1. FIRs were registered with Government Railway Police, Faridabad by the Station House Officer, Ambala Cantonment, Randhir Singh (ASI) against the prime accused, Rahim Khan for offences of fraud and forgery of the railway receipts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.M. Mallewar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Mar-26-1993
Commercial
Constitution of India - Articles 10(1), 13(3), 14, 19(1), 37, 47, 246, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305 and 326; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 23, 24-A, 52, 53, 54, 56, 136, 139(1), 143 and 144; Madras Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949; Kerala Essential Articles Control (Temporary Powers) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3; Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 58 and 59; Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act - Sections 256; U.P. Town Areas Act - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979;
AIR1993Bom327; 2004(3)BomCR371; 1993(1)MhLj685
S.A. Bobde, ;Sunil V. Manohar, ;C.S. Kaptan, ;Mrs. N.S. Jog, ;Miss A. Kinkhed, ;S.G. Aney, ;N.W. Sambre, Advs.
1. By these writ petitions filed under Art. 326 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have impugned the statutory notification dated the 14th of September, 1992, bearing No. BPA-1088/ 1866/EXC-3, issued by the Government of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwan Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-29-2008
Criminal
(2008)2PLR638
Sham Sunder, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of three criminal appeals bearing No. 598-SB of 1999 filed by Balwan Singh, 599-SB of 1999 filed by Shamsher Singh and 600-SB of 1999 filed by Krishan Kumar arising...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jitender Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-19-2009
Criminal
2009CriLJ3347
ORDERSham Sunder, J.1. This revision-petition is directed against the judgment dated 11.10.1999, rendered by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge Bhiwani, vide which it dismissed the appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 03.03.1998 and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri R.P.S. Panwar Vs. Union of India, Through Director (Estt), Depart ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Sep-25-2012
Education
For the Applicant : R.P. Kapoor, Advocate. For the Respondents : Shri Krishan Kumar, Advocate.
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): Through the instant Original Application, Shri R.P.S. Panwar - a retired ITS Officer, the applicant herein, is seeking the following main relief(s):- “8.03.That (Annexure A-1, A-2, A-3 and to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurinder Kumar Bindal Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
May-14-2003
CriminalElectricity
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379
3(2003)CCR92; 105(2003)DLT58; 2003(69)DRJ368; 2003(2)JCC1163
Krishan Kumar, Adv
ORDER1. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner has already deposited the bill amount in the office of the respondent No. 2 and endorsement of the same is given on the receipt...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita Bhutani Vs. Sat Pal
Delhi
Sep-24-1985
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
28(1985)DLT472
Krishan Kumar, Adv
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) By this petition Smt. Sunita Bhutani has challenged the legality and correctness of the order passed on 5th May, 1984, by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the monthly maintenance of Rs. 300.00...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. T.P. Khaitan
Delhi
Dec-06-1983
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111, 155, 397, 398 and 403
[1986]60CompCas28(Delhi); 25(1984)DLT120; ILR1984Delhi688
P.C. Khanna and; Krishan Kumar, Advs
D.R. Khanna, J. 1. Technically speaking, this petition moved under section 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, by one Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd., has become infructuous inasmuch as the relief sought for cannot any longer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmrit Lal Seth Vs. Seth Hotels (P.) Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB Delhi
Feb-17-2009
Land Acquisition
2009(95)SCL161(CLB-NEWDELHI)
Amrit Lal Seth for the Petitioner. Krishan Kumar, Pradeep Kumar Kar, R.L. Garg and Anil Bhutan for the Respondent.
1. The petitioner holding 100 shares and claiming to be entitled to 20 per cent shares in M/s. Seth Hotels Private Limited has filed this petition alleging that by issue and allotment of further shares, his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohinder Kumar Vs. State
Delhi
May-02-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498-A, 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 311
Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Adv.
1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 6.2.1999, appellant Mohinder Kumar, husband of deceased Seema has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Section 302 IPC. As per the order on sentence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »