Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kothandaraman · Page 1 of about 251 results (0.237 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 14 1990

Gautam Menon Vs. Sucharitha Gautam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 25

Reported in : I(1992)DMC79; (1991)IMLJ212

Advocate for Appellant : Kothandaraman, Adv.

Lakshmanan, J.1. This petition is filed by the husband against his wife, the respondent herein, under Sections 3 and 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and Order 21, Rules 1 and 2 of Original Side...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1982

Amitkumar Amichand by Partner S. Mohanlal Vs. Jawanthraj and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-07-1982

Subject : TenancyCivil

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ353

S. Mohan, J.1. The tenant is the revision-petitioner and the revision arises out of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of I960), hereinafter referred to as the Act.2. The respondents (landlords) filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2013

R. Kothandaraman Vs. the Speaker, Lok Sabha Secretariat and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-10-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K.Saini, Mr. R. Kothandaraman

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P. (C) No.7132/2009 Reserved on : January 04, 2013 Pronounced on: January, 10, 2013 R. KOTHANDARAMAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. with Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2026

Arunagiri vs Shalini Suresh

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-2026

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kothandaraman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on:05.01.2026 Pronounced on:09.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. No.2672 of 2023 and CMP. No.16513 of 2023 1.Arunagiri 2.Sujaya Giri Petitioner(s) Vs Shalini Suresh Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1996

A. Somu thevar Vs. Sivakumar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-15-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC57

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Kothandaraman, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Generally this Court is reluctant to disturb an acquittal recorded by the trial Court, in a revision against such acquittal, that too at the instance of a private party, when the State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1979

Marudachala Udayar Vs. Dhandapani

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-1979

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1980)1MLJ169

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.N. Kothandaraman

S. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This revision has been preferred by the landlord under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act XVIII of 1960, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The respondent herein is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2010

M/S. Precot Meridian Ltd. Vs. Cce, Coimbatore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S. Kothandaraman, Consultant, for the appellant. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the respondent

Heard both sides. It is the case of the department that the impugned machine was procured by the appellants when they were an export oriented unit, under CT-3 Certificate without payment of duty. Subsequently, the appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2011

Annamallai Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Aug-19-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: S. Kothandaraman, Consultant. For the Respondent: Parmod Kumar, SDR.

1. Heard both sides. Shri S.Kothandaraman, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants states that the dispute in this case is restricted to imposition of penalty. He states that appellants themselves voluntarily approached the departmental authorities and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1990

S. Sukumar Vs. Spl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-12-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211 and 216; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1991Mad238

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Kothandaraman

1. This writ petition coming on for orders as to admission on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Kothandaraman, Advocate for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1972

Padmasani Ammal Vs. Devaraja Pillai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madras City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rules 7 and 19

Reported in : AIR1973Mad294; (1973)1MLJ26

1. The respondent in the above appeals and civil revision petition was the defendant in O. S. No. 3185 of 1960 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras. The suit was filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial