Advanced Search Results
Gautam Menon Vs. Sucharitha Gautam
Chennai
Nov-14-1990
Family
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 25
I(1992)DMC79; (1991)IMLJ212
Kothandaraman, Adv.
Lakshmanan, J.1. This petition is filed by the husband against his wife, the respondent herein, under Sections 3 and 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and Order 21, Rules 1 and 2 of Original Side...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmitkumar Amichand by Partner S. Mohanlal Vs. Jawanthraj and ors.
Chennai
Jan-07-1982
TenancyCivil
(1982)2MLJ353
S. Mohan, J.1. The tenant is the revision-petitioner and the revision arises out of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of I960), hereinafter referred to as the Act.2. The respondents (landlords) filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Kothandaraman Vs. the Speaker, Lok Sabha Secretariat and anr.
Delhi
Jan-10-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. R.K.Saini, Mr. R. Kothandaraman
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P. (C) No.7132/2009 Reserved on : January 04, 2013 Pronounced on: January, 10, 2013 R. KOTHANDARAMAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. with Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arunagiri vs Shalini Suresh
Chennai
Jan-09-2026
Mr. Kothandaraman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on:05.01.2026 Pronounced on:09.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. No.2672 of 2023 and CMP. No.16513 of 2023 1.Arunagiri 2.Sujaya Giri Petitioner(s) Vs Shalini Suresh Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Somu thevar Vs. Sivakumar and anr.
Chennai
Nov-15-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401
1997(1)CTC57
R.N. Kothandaraman, Adv.
ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Generally this Court is reluctant to disturb an acquittal recorded by the trial Court, in a revision against such acquittal, that too at the instance of a private party, when the State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarudachala Udayar Vs. Dhandapani
Chennai
Mar-02-1979
Tenancy
(1980)1MLJ169
Mr. R.N. Kothandaraman
S. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This revision has been preferred by the landlord under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act XVIII of 1960, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The respondent herein is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Precot Meridian Ltd. Vs. Cce, Coimbatore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Mar-11-2010
Service Tax
Shri S. Kothandaraman, Consultant, for the appellant. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the respondent
Heard both sides. It is the case of the department that the impugned machine was procured by the appellants when they were an export oriented unit, under CT-3 Certificate without payment of duty. Subsequently, the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnnamallai Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Aug-19-2011
Service Tax
For the Appellants: S. Kothandaraman, Consultant. For the Respondent: Parmod Kumar, SDR.
1. Heard both sides. Shri S.Kothandaraman, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants states that the dispute in this case is restricted to imposition of penalty. He states that appellants themselves voluntarily approached the departmental authorities and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Sukumar Vs. Spl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madras
Chennai
Feb-12-1990
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211 and 216; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1
AIR1991Mad238
Mr. P. Kothandaraman
1. This writ petition coming on for orders as to admission on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Kothandaraman, Advocate for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmasani Ammal Vs. Devaraja Pillai
Chennai
Apr-01-1972
Tenancy
Madras City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rules 7 and 19
AIR1973Mad294; (1973)1MLJ26
1. The respondent in the above appeals and civil revision petition was the defendant in O. S. No. 3185 of 1960 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras. The suit was filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »