Advanced Search Results
Princess Usha Trust Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-09-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)164CTR(MP)381
Kochatta, for the Assessee R.L. Jain, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.By this petition, filed under articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, claims following reliefs for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 :'An appropriate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDineshkumar Shukla Vs. Smt. Neeta
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-04-2005
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1), 13B, 13B(1) and 13B(2)
AIR2005MP106; II(2005)DMC51; 2005(4)MPHT168; 2005(1)MPLJ362
R.C. Kochatta, Adv.
S.K. Seth, J. 1. Noticing diametrical opposite views taken by co-ordinate benches learned single Judge has referred the following question to resolve the conflict of views.'Whether the Court is required to wait for a period of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steels Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-06-2004
CompanyBanking
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433
III(2004)BC548; [2004]55SCL702(MP)
S.R. Kochatta, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. This is a Company Petition filed under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act seeking winding up of the respondent Company known as G.M. Mittal Stainless Steels Ltd. The winding up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sanjay Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh
May-12-2004
Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 7(2), 8(3) and 44(1); Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1958 - Rule 20B
[2006]146STC552(MP)
S.R. Kochatta, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is a sale tax reference made at the instance of a dealer hereinafter called 'the assessee' Under Section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (for short called 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHind Syntex Ltd. Vs. Dewas Textile Mills
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-11-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 433(2), 434 and 434(2)
[2003]115CompCas51(MP); [2004(101)FLR554]; [2003]42SCL889(MP)
S.R. Kochatta, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is a company petition filed by petitioner under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, seeking winding up of the respondent-company essentially on the ground covered under Section 433(e) of Companies Act.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsha Choudhary Vs. Rajesh Kumar
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-28-1992
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 28
II(1992)DMC420
R.S. Kochatta, Adv.
S.K. Dubey, J.1. This appeal under Order 43 Rule l(d) of theCode of Civil Procedure, read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955(for short the 'Act'), is against the order dt. 24.10.89 passed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
May-08-1995
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 11A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1945; Central Excise and Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2)
1995(51)ECC102; 1995LC40(MP); 1995(80)ELT774(MP)
B.G. Neema, Adv.
ORDER1. This appeal and the other connected appeals have been preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge passed on 8-9-1994 in M.P. No. 779/89, M.P. No. 1099/88, M.P. No. 1101/88, M.P. No. 1356/88, M.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Bimlabai W/O Khushalsingh and ors. Vs. Shri Shantilal S/O Dhannaj ...
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-19-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 14, Rule 5
AIR1993MP44
S.C. Agrawal, Adv.
ORDERV.S. Kokje, J. 1. Heard Shri S. C. Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri R. C. Kochatta, learned counsel for the non-applicants. 2. In this revision application non-framing of additional issues by the trial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajiv Udyog
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-08-1996
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2) and 271(1)
[1997]227ITR209(MP)
D.D. Vyas, Adv.
A.R. Tiwari, J. 1. The applicant (Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal) has filed this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(for short 'the Act'), seeking a direction to the Tribunal to state a case and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Bilkishbai
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-22-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)
[1997]225ITR570(MP)
D.D. Vyas and ;Bhadang, Advs.
N.K. Jain, J.1. By this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the applicant--Department seeks a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore, to state the case and refer the undernoted questions said to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »