Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kiran jain · Page 1 of about 212 results (0.072 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 10 2005

Arun Maini Vs. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 105, 106, 107 and 111; Rent Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC2193

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain, ;M.K. Nigam, ;Vivek Verma, ;Ravi Kant and ;Tulika Prakash, Advs.

Poonam Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kiran Jain, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Verma, advocate, for the appellant and Sri S. P. Gupta, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Anurag Khanna, advocate for the contesting defendant/respondent-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2000

Amrendra Nath Singh Vs. Bar Council of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-01-2000

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bar Council of India Rules, 1968 - Rules 4, 11, 40 and 42; Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh Election Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 4(1) and 32(8); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 24(1), 24A, 24A(1), 24A(2), 35 and 35(1); Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; Probation of Offenders (Amendment) Act, 1968

Reported in : AIR2000All224; (2000)1UPLBEC825

Advocate for Appellant : Anand Prakash Pandey, ;Rajesh Kumar Singh, ;A.D. Giri, ;L.P. Naithani, ;Ravi Kiran Jain and ;Subodh Kumar, Advs.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. The aforesaid three writ petitions have been filed challenging the actions/omissions of Bar council of Uttar Pradesh pertaining to the election held for constituting fresh Bar Council and thus, questions of law and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2008

Dayal Chand JaIn Vs. Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2745

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri Ravi Kiran Jain, senior advocate assisted by Shri R.K. Awasthi for the petitioner. Learned standing counsel appears for the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Allahabad-respondent No. 1. Shri Ravi Kant,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2005

Committee of Management and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 14, 14(6) and 18; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 28(5) and 37(2); Uttar Pradesh State Universities (Amendment) Act, 2004; University Grant Commision Act - Sections 3, 3(3) and 22

Reported in : 2005(4)ESC2474

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain and ;Shamim Ahmad, Advs.

1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.1.2005 which has been passed by the Chancellor of the Bhim Rao Ambedkar University, Agra (hereinafter referred to as the 'University') and for a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2000

People Union for Civil Liberties Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-06-2000

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 4(2), 5(2), 26, 28, 32, 33, 35(2), 37, 38, 90 and 91; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134, 226 and 229; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 100 and 115 - Order XLI, Rule 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374 and 401; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 59(2)

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC1; (2001)1UPLBEC3

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Roy and ;Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.

G. P. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (for short P.U.C.L.) praying that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the Central Bureau...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1994

M/S. Northland Traders and Others Vs. Bank of Baroda

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-15-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63, 64, 65 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 14 - Order 11, Rule 14 - Order 29, Rule 1; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970; Indian Contract Act - Sections 182, 186, 188 to 194 and 210

Reported in : AIR1994All381

Advocate for Appellant : R.B.D. Mishra and ;Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision by the defendants is directed against the order dated 7-2-1992, passed by VIII Additional Civil Judge, Moradabad, deciding the preliminary issue No. 1 in favour of the plaintiff and holding that the person...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2000

Ratan Kumar Dixit and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-24-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243C, 243K, 243O, 243P, 243T and 243ZG; Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1959 - Sections 2(53A), 7 and 32(1) and (2); Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Reservation and Allotment of seats and office) Rules, 1994; Delimitation Act, 1950 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3433; (2001)1UPLBEC390

Advocate for Appellant : Pushkar Mahrotra and ;Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.

Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J. and G. P. Mathur, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying for several reliefs and the principal reliefs are that the notification issued by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1997

Haji Mohammad Hanif Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Samities and Zila Parishads Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 15(3); Motion of Non-confidence Against Pramukhs and Up-Pramukh of Kshettra Samiti Rules, 1962 - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1998)2UPLBEC841

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain and ;B.K. Awasthi, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The order contained in notice dated 26.8.1997, issued by the Collector, Moradabad, under Section 15(3) of U.P. Kshettra Samitis and Zila Parishads Adhiniyam, 1961 (The title of this Adhiniyam has been substituted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1999

Geeta Pump (Private) Limited Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : ElectricityConsumer

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 39, Rule 1; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22B, 26 and 26(4); Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Consumption and Use) Order, 1977; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 39 and 41; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 47 and 57(4); Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 15, 16, 19(5), 21 and 23; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2000All58

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravi Kiran Jain, Mr. Jain

ORDERD.K. Seth, J. 1. This petition was filed by M/s. Geeta Pump (Private) Limited for quashing the order dated 5th May, 1988 contained in Annexure 28 to the writ petition passed by the learned District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2000

Peoples' Union for Civil Liberties, U.P. Bench Vs. State of U.P. and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 2(1), 3, 9, 10, 12 to 18, 20, 21, 21(1), (2) and (3), 22, 22(1), 29, 30 and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 226; Protection of Human Rights Ordinance, 1993; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 58 and 176; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; President's Rule; Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC729

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain, ;K.K. Roy and ;Pushkar Mehrotra, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and R. K. Singh, JJ.1. The petitioner has come up to this Court for commanding respondent No. 1 the State of U. P. to (i) constitute a State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial