Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: king · Page 1 of about 14,825 results (0.384 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1944

Dhanjishaw Rattanji Karani Vs. Bombay Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1944

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1945Bom320; (1945)47BOMLR304

Bhagwati, J.1. The judgment first set out the pleadings and discussed issues of facts and proceeded : In the course of the evidence which was led on behalf of the plaintiff, Mr. Maneksha tendered the certified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2015

Lakshmi Kanth Shinde @ L.K. Shinde Vs. The State of Telangana represen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-2015

Subject : Education

1. In the present writ petition, challenge is to the Memorandum No.1697/SC-A/A2/2008-4 dated 22.08.2011 issued by the first respondent State Government. By virtue of the said memorandum, the State Government permitted the Anti-Corruption Bureau to file...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1990

Dattaram Advertising Private Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-11-1990

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 11, 12(1), 12(3), 12A, 12A(1) and 23(3)

Reported in : [1991]81STC394(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Kumar for M/s King and Partridge

M.P. Chandrakantharaj Urs, J. 1. There petitions are disposed of by this common order, as all of them raise the same questions of law which are required to be decided by us under section 23(3) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 31 1962

Bandulal Balaprasad Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-31-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections - 251A, 262(1) and 537; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65, 116 and 262

Reported in : AIR1962Bom258; (1962)64BOMLR354; ILR1962Bom490

Advocate for Appellant : A.A. Peerbhoy and ;H.A. Tambe, Advs.

Chainani, C.J.(1) This is an application in revision by the accused, who has been convicted under clauses (b) (c) and (f) of section 65 and clause (b) of section 66 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1961

Dr. S.C. Barat and anr. Vs. Hari Vinayak Pataskar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-08-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Jabalpur University Act, 1956 - Sections 11, 11(2), 34 and 48; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1962MP73

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Dabir, ;V.S. Dabir and ;R.P. Sinha, Advs.

Dixit, C.J.1. The petitioners in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution are members of the Jabalpur University Court. The applicant Dr. S.C. Barat is also a member of the Executive Council of the University...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1993

Chandrakant Ratilal Mehta and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR99; 1993CriLJ2863

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Sawant, Adv. for ;S.B. Pawar, ;S.R. Parekh, ;S.J. Thakkar and ;Ku. Vidya Kasle, Advs.

1. Exceptional as it may seem, this set of appeals concerns the familiar situation of an approach being made to a Minister that the law should be transgressed, the reward offered being a large sum of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1950

Province of Bombay Vs. Kusaldas S. Advani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-1950

Subject : Property

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 176 and 306; Bombay Land Requisition Ordinance, 1947 - Sections 3, 4, 10 and 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 176 and 177; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Specific Relief Act - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1950SC222; (1951)53BOMLR1; (1950)IIMLJ703(SC); [1950]1SCR621

Kania, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Bombay and it relates to the power of the High Court to issue a writ of certiorari against the province of Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2012

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Devi Prasad Singh, J. 1. WITH the change of Government, the creation of new districts has become a routine feature in the State of Uttar Pradesh that too, without adverting to financial viability and necessity. Ordinarily,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2016

Dr. Y. Manjunath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-25-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. These petitions are heard and disposed of by this common order, as the petitions are filed challenging the same proceedings. 2. The facts are stated to be as follows. The petitioner in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1932

Emperor Vs. Ramrao Mangesh Burde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-29-1932

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1932Bom406; (1932)34BOMLR598

Wadia, J.1. The accused in this case are charged with being parties to a conspiracy in or about October 1930 to do certain illegal acts consisting of offences under the Indian Penal Code. Accused Nos. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial