Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kedarnath sinha · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.022 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 1949

Sat NaraIn Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-25-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 345(2)

Reported in : AIR1950All86

Advocate for Appellant : Kedarnath Sinha, ;Vishwa Nath Singh and ;Rama Shanker Pd., Advs.;Kanahaya Lal Misra, Adv.

Bind Basni Prasad, J.1. When the complainant himself considers this compensation as adequate I do not think it was proper for the learned Sessions Judge to hold it was insufficient. A compromise in a case like...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2017

Chintamani Karmhe Vs. Human Resource Development

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-25-2017

Subject : Education

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 549 of 2010 with W.P.(S) No. 7491 of 2012 Chandreshwar Prasad Sinha son of late Kedarnath Sinha, resident of Village- Sudna Bypass Road, P.O. &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2017

Chandreshwar Prasad Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-25-2017

Subject : Education

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 549 of 2010 with W.P.(S) No. 7491 of 2012 Chandreshwar Prasad Sinha son of late Kedarnath Sinha, resident of Village- Sudna Bypass Road, P.O. &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 1953

Mohan Lal and ors. Vs. the Surpunch, Punchaiti Adalat, Ugaipur and anr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-08-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 49(2), 77A(1) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules - Rule 95; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1954All159

Advocate for Appellant : Kedar Nath Sinha, Adv.

ORDERDesai, J. 1. The applicants have been convicted by a Panchayati Adalat under Sections 447 and 426, I.P.C. They apply for the order of the Panchayati Adalat being quashed on three grounds. The first ground is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1953

Mohan Lal and ors. Vs. the Surpunch, Punchaiti Adalat and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-08-1953

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1954CriLJ282

ORDERDesai, J.1. The applicants have been convicted by a Parichayati Adalat under Sections 447 and 426, I.P.C. They apply for the order of the Panchayati Adalat being quashed on three grounds. The first ground is that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial