Advanced Search Results

Shri Wasudeoraoji Sheorey Vs. Shri A.D. Mani, Managing Editor hitavada

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1951CriLJ452

Mudholakar, J.1. I agree. The principle on which the Ct. acted in cases of this kind had been clearly stated in Beg v. Payne (1896) 12 T. L. R. 321, by Lord Russel who said:The appct....

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramachandran

Aftab Alam, J.1. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid (hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellant’ or as ‘Kasab’), who is a Pakistani national, has earned for himself five death penalties and an...

Gulmohammad S/O Khudabux and ors. Vs. Viniyabai W/O Siddhanath and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 40 to 42, 62, 63, 64 to 82 and 83; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1963MP9

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Karkare, Adv.

A.H. Khan, J. 1. This is an appeal against an order under Section 151, C. P. C. passed under the Lunacy Act. No appeal lies against an order passed by a court under its inherent powers....

Kanchhedilal Umrao Singh Vs. Maursi Ranjeet Kachhi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 12

Reported in : AIR1960MP140

Advocate for Appellant : Karkare, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, J.1. This appeal was filed on 3-8-1959 from the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Bhilasa, on 30-3-1959. The office report is that it is barred by time. Copies of the...

Gajanan Vishwanath Ketkar Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1)

Reported in : AIR1967Bom96; (1966)68BOMLR321; 1967CriLJ427; ILR1966Bom839

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Pathak, Adv.

Naik, J.(1) This ia an application by Gajanan Vishwanath ketkar under Section 491, Cr. P. C. and Art, 226 of the constitution of India for a Writ of habeas corpus challenging the order of detention passed...

S.K. Dubey Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Etc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(1), 226 and 309

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi60; 1983LabIC1118; 1983(2)SLJ547(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi and; R.N. Sharma, Sr. Advs. and; N.N. Sharma

Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of quo warranto by Shri. S.K. Dubey, petitioner, against Shri Ram Kumar, respondent No....

Ramdeen and anr. Vs. Laxmi Kumar Shriniwas and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 48

Reported in : AIR1959MP396

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Krishan Dixit, Adv.

Shiv Dayal Shrivastava, J. 1. This is a second appeal by two of the judgment-debtors. In Civil Suit No. 112 of 1990 Samvat, the Court of District Sub-Judge, Bhind on June 4, 1935 passed a decree...

State of Uttaranchal Vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935; Preventive Detention Act; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 43; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; ESSO (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1974; Burma Shell (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1976; Caltex India Limited) Act, 1977; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; Representation of the People Act, 1976; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19, 21, 22, 22(1), 24, 32, 47, 48A, 51A, 76, 124, 165, 183(3), 217, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 226, 226(32) and 183(3); Supreme Court Rules - Order 53, Rule 3(5); Civil Procedure Federal Rules - Rule 11; Professional Conduct

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC329; 2010(I)OLR(SC)380; RLW2010(1)SC506; 2010(1)SCALE492; 2010(2)LC511(SC); (2010)3SCC402

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.,; S.S. Shamshery and; Rachna Sriva

ORDER 53, RULES OF THE SUPT. CT. (1981). In Inland Revenue Commissioners v. National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd. (1982) A.C. 617 the Court explained that 'fairness and justice are tests to be applied'...

Mahavir Saremal JaIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.P. Bhangale, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and Heard by consent. 2. The petitioner seeks to invoke writ jurisdiction of this court questioning validity of the order dated 31-08-2012 in appeal no EXT-2012 /128...

Subhan Mohammed Mustafa Sayyed Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Oka, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the order of externment dated 7th May 2012...