Advanced Search Results

Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22(1), 32, 93, 94, 124(4), 131, 136, 141, 142, 145(3), 217(1)(C) and 226; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - Sections 3(2) and 4(2); Judges (Enquiry) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6, 7, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Attorney Genral,; Kapil Sibal,; Shanti Bhishan

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. Both these writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment since they involve for decision substantially the same points. In Writ Petition...

C.B.i., A.H.D., Patna Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89 and 89(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4(2), 13 and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 178 to 180 and 181(4); Minnesota Constitution - Sections 1 - Schedule - Article 9; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)356; AIR2001SC4014; 2001CriLJ4683; JT2001(8)SC348; 2001(6)SCALE641; (2001)9SCC432

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Kapil Sibal, P.S. Mishra,;

Thomas, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question is short but the range of consideration got widened much. Answer to the question may be of advantage to some accused and disadvantage to some other accused who are involved...

Mapsore Advertising Agency Vs. Feedback Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32 137, 226, 142 and 142(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 144 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi251; 111(2004)DLT160; 2004(74)DRJ117

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal,; Rajeev Nayar, Advs.,; Manmohan, Senior Ad

Dalveer Bhandari, J. 1.In the race of becoming No.1 newspaper in the country, all norms and expected ethical standards have been thrown to the winds. Unfortunately, fraud is the foundation of this litigation in which court's...

Sukumar Mukherjee ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : West Bengal State Health Service Act, 1990 - Sections 2, 3, 4(3), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14(2A), 16 and 20; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 18 and 27; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 252, 254 and 309; West Bengal Health Service Rules, 1993 - Rules 5, 7, 8 and 10; Indian Medical Council Act, 1961; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1962 - Sections 11 and 48(8); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1993SC2335; JT1993(4)SC308; 1993LabIC2035; (1994)ILLJ94SC; 1993(3)SCALE260; (1993)3SCC723; [1993]Supp1SCR339

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal,; G. Ramaswamy,; A.K. Sen,;

ORDERP.B. Sawant, J.Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.1. This group of appeals is directed against the decision of the High Court dated 31st January, 1992 dismissing the appellants' appeals against the verdict of the...

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapil Sibal Sr. Adv.,; Mr. Pravin Anand,; Ms Usha Chan

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The plaintiffs claiming to be engaged in the sale of suit cases all over the globe have instituted the suit against the defendants stating that the defendants have infringed the plaintiff's copyright in...

Amitabh Bachhan Corporation Ltd. Vs. Om Pal Singh Hoon

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5B

Reported in : 1996(37)DRJ352

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal,; S. Murlidhar,; Soli J. Sorabjee,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J.(1) These appeals arise out of the Judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 7.3.1996 in C.W.P. No. 383 of 1996. Lpa 39/96 is preferred by M/s Amitabh Bachan Corporation Ltd. Lpa 43/96...

Public Union for Civil Liberties and ors. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1995)ILLJ259SC; (1994)5SCC116

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. We have heard Mr Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate who appears at our request as amicus curiae in this matter, as well as the other learned Counsel appearing in this case. It does not...

Nisha Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi439

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Appellant is the owner/landlady of the suit property bearing No. XVI 10203, Karol Bagh, Padam Singh Road, New Delhi. The building in which the suit premises is situate is known as 'Jamuna House'....

G. Narasimha Murthy Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 28, 29, 29(2), 35, 35(1), 35(2) and 36; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 22(1), 22(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43 and 43(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 59, 80, 92, 113, 115 and 122 - Order 47; Conditions of Service Order, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 17, 17(2), 18 and 19; Central Hindi Directorate (Class III and Class IV) Posts Recruitment Rules, 1961 - Rules 4, 6, 6(1) and 7; Central Administrative Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1987 - Rules 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 26, 30,

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD370; 2006(3)ALT433

Advocate for Appellant : Rama Rao, ;Subrahmanya Sarma, ;Krishna Murtby, ;C. Sai Reddy, ;P. Venkataswamy, ;C. Nagaiab, ;K. Satyanarayana Rao, ;K. Umapati and ;G. Tuhini Kumar, Advs.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The question of the power of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short hereinafter referred to as 'A.P.A.T.') to condone the delay beyond the period specified under Rule 17 of the Andhra Pradesh...

Mithilesh Kumar Sinha and Kaka Joginder Singh Alias Dharati Pakad Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 - Sections 5B(1), 13, 14A, 17 and 18(1); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23, Rule 6 - Order 39, Rules 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 20 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 14, 38, 21(3), 52, 53, 54, 55, 58(3), 60, 66, 71(3), 79, 84 and 102; Constitutional Eleventh Amendment Act, 1961; Anti Defection Act; Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 12 and 16; Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act, 1977; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 171C

Reported in : AIR1993SC20; JT1992(5)SC479; 1992(2)SCALE566; 1993Supp(4)SCC386; [1992]Supp1SCR651

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-perso

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. Both these election petitions filed under Section 14 of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenge the election of Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma, as the ninth...