Advanced Search Results

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Shimla Vs. Sushila Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 1(3), 3(1A), 5(5) and 5(3); ;Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Section 2; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110D

Reported in : AIR1986HP78

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Dhanna, Adv.; Inder Singh and; Kapil Dev Sood,

P.D. Desai, C.J.1. The case has been listed before us today because the appellant has failed to comply with the following order made in C.M.P. No. 1203 of 1984 :-'The appellant-applicant will deposit the awarded amount...

Mohinder Kumar Sood Vs. H.P. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15, 16, 29, 29(2), 226, 234, 309, 341 and 342; ;Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 1973 - Rule 5(9); ;Ex-Servicemen (Reservation of Vacancies in H.P. Judicial Service) Rules, 1981

Reported in : AIR1982HP78

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Dev Sood and; Deepak Gupta, Advs.

V.D. Misra, C.J.1. The last examination for recruitment to the Hima-chal Pradesh Judicial Service (referred to as the Service) was held by the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (referred to as the Commission) in 1975. In...

Mehar Singh Manhas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC212

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. The present petition has been filed against Annexures P-3, P-5 and P-8, dated 14.7.1998, 14.3.2000 and 2.6.1999, respectively.2. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner was recruited...

H.P. Housing Board Vs. Rajeev Bros.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC515

Kuldip Singh, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment, decree dated 30.3.2G02 passed by learned District Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, in Civil Suit No. 5-D/I/1999 dismissing the suit of the appellant for recovery of...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Thakur Dass and Etc. Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1694

V.D. Misra, C.J.1. Whether Rule 9-A. Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules (referred to as the Rules) is directory or mandatory is the question which falls for decision in a number of appeals. Rule 9-A reads:9-A. The...

The State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Daulat Ram Attri

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 23 and 54

Reported in : AIR1981HP71

Advocate for Appellant : Inder Singh, Adv. General

V.D. Misra, C.J.1. This judgment will dispose of R. F, As. Nos. 451 to 459 of 1980 since these arise out of a common judgment,2. The appeals are directed against the judgment of Shri C. S....

Manager, Medico Pharmaceutical Processors Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ67

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapil Dev Sood

ORDERVyas Dev Misra, C.J.1. Shri S. N. Sharma, Drugs Inspector Dharamsala, on 27th Feb., 1979 went to the shop of M/s. Best Pharma Corporation, Palampur, pharmaceutical distributors (referred to as the Vendor), and took a sample...

State of H.P. and ors. Vs. Presiding Judge and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 1, 2, 22, 25F and 25G; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2006)3LLJ527HP,2007(3)ShimLC360

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Choudhary, Addl. A.G.

ORDERK.C. Sood, J.1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the award made by the Presiding Judge, H.P. Labour Court, Shimla on October 10, 2002 in Reference No. 12 of...

Bela Singh Vs. Smt. Neena Kumari Kaushik

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 96

Reported in : AIR1984HP7

Advocate for Appellant : Devinder Gupta, Adv.

ORDERVyas Dev Misra, C.J.1. The learned counsel forthe parties agree that the whole revision can be decided peremptorily.2. The respondent is the landlord and the present petitioner is the tenant. The landlordd made an application for...

In Re: Morepen Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1), 391(6), 393 and 433; ;Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas368(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Karol,; Aman Sood,; Rahul Mahajan and;

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. A petition under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), was filed by M/s. Morepen Laboratories Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), having its registered...