Advanced Search Results

The State of Bihar Vs. Manoj Kumar Singh and Yogendra Singh

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act-Sections 10, 24 to 26, 27, 63(2) and 65B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -Sections 161, 162, 164 and 313; Indian Penal Code-Sections 34, 120B, 201, 302 and 364A

Advocate for Appellant : Surendra Singh, Rana Pratap Singh, Rajendra Prasad Singh and Kamal Nayan Choubey, Sr. Adv., Asha Verma, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Nawal Kishor Singh, Rajani Kant Pandey, Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Sumant Sing

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Death Reference Case No. 4 of 2007 and Cr. Appeal Nos. 836, 887, 960 and 1006 of 2007 arise out of Judgment and Order dated 6/7.06.2007, passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad...

Lakshmi Cement Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 30 and 30(1)

Reported in : [2004]137STC74(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Senior Adv. and; Rajendra Mehta, Adv.

1. This special appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated July 24, 2002, Reported in Lakshmi Cement v. State of Rajasthan . dismissing the appellant's writ petition challenging the reassessment notice...

Bhirug Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 504 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 248(2)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ271

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Singh, Adv.

ORDERJ.C. Gupta, J. 1. Heard Sri Kameshwar Singh, counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.2. By means of this revision the applicant has challenged the concurrent order of the Judicial Magistrate, Ballia and...

F.K. Hasheeb and Co. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales TaxCivil

Reported in : [1966]17STC38(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.T. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDERRamamurti, J.1. The main point that arises for determination in this revision petition is whether the assessment made by the assessing authority on 22nd October, 1959, could be modified only by the very assessing authority under...

Arbind Kumar Pandey Vs. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Madhup and Durganand Jha, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 4 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Principal, Mahanth Shatanand Giri...

ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Prades ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 31(2), 31(3), 226, 246, 246(3) and 254; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act 1956 - Sections 26; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India (fourth Amendment) Act, 1955; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 671; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2 and 3 to 30; Haryana Minerals (Vesting of Rights) Act, 1973; Government of India Act, 1935; Madras Electric Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1949; Bihar Land Reforms Act; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Kannan Devan Hills (Resumption of Lands) Act, 1971; Metal Corporation of India (Acquisition) Act, 1965; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acq

Reported in : AIR1980SC1955; (1980)4SCC136; [1980]3SCR331; 1981(13)LC87(SC)

D.A. Desai, J.1. Acquisition of industrial undertakings involved in manufacturing sugar, a commodity satisfying the basic necessity, in larger public interest and the attempt of the owners of the undertakings to thwart the same, paints the...

The Bihar Agriculture Marketing Board Employees Association Through It ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006 - Sections 4, 6 and 6(1); Bihar Agriculture Produce Market Act, 1960 - Sections 3; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1949; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107; Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Act, 1950; Legislative Act; Constitution of India - Articles 4, 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(5), 19(6), 31(2), 143, 212, 212(2), 213, 254, 255, 301, 302, 303, 303(1), 304 and 304(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Janam Ojha, Ram Balak Mahto, Shyama Pd. Mukherjee, Binod Kumar Kanth, K.N. Choubey and Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advs., Niranjan Kumar and Jai Prakash Verma, Advs.Kameshwar Pd. Gupta, Satya Prakash

Rajesh Balia, C.J. and Barin Ghosh, J.1. In all these writ petitions the constitutional validity of Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Repeal Act of 2006') has been challenged.The petitioners,...

Chandra Mohan Saha and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 79 and 115 - Order 1, Rule 13 - Order 41, Rule 23 - Order 43, Rule 1; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3, 3(6) and 80

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Ghose and P. Choudhury, Advs.

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J. CIVIL REVISION NO. 119 OF 1952 1. The petitioner in this case instituted Money Suit No. 50 of 1949 in the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge at Dhubri for recovery of a...

Laxminarayan Temple, Kothure, Through Its Trustees Vs. Laxman Mahadu C ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVII-A; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(5), 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 27, 28, 31, 31A, 31B, 226 and 227; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32 to 32R, 88B, 88B(1) and 88B(2); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amended) Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 4B, 8, 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 10, 10A, 11, 13 and 27; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Rules, 1956 - Rule 52; ;Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Zamindari Abolition Law

Reported in : AIR1970Bom23; (1969)71BOMLR197; ILR1970Bom1289; 1969MhLJ476

Advocate for Appellant : G.H. Guttal and ;V.M. Limaye, Advs.

Tarkunde, J.1. These four petitions have given rise to common questions relating to the interpretation of the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 88B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and the constitutional...

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Hajarnavis, S.R. Deshpande, S.N. Kherdekar, J.N. Chandurkar, B.R. Mandlekar, R.N. Deshpande, V.L. Mohta, R.N. Pendharkar, V.R. Manohar, V.S. Sohoni, R.M. Joharapurkar, B.P. Jaiswal, M.S. Choudhar

Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...