Advanced Search Results

The State of Bihar Vs. Manoj Kumar Singh and Yogendra Singh

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act-Sections 10, 24 to 26, 27, 63(2) and 65B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -Sections 161, 162, 164 and 313; Indian Penal Code-Sections 34, 120B, 201, 302 and 364A

Advocate for Appellant : Surendra Singh, Rana Pratap Singh, Rajendra Prasad Singh and Kamal Nayan Choubey, Sr. Adv., Asha Verma, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Nawal Kishor Singh, Rajani Kant Pandey, Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Sumant Sing

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Death Reference Case No. 4 of 2007 and Cr. Appeal Nos. 836, 887, 960 and 1006 of 2007 arise out of Judgment and Order dated 6/7.06.2007, passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad...

Lakshmi Cement Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 30 and 30(1)

Reported in : [2004]137STC74(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Senior Adv. and; Rajendra Mehta, Adv.

1. This special appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated July 24, 2002, Reported in Lakshmi Cement v. State of Rajasthan . dismissing the appellant's writ petition challenging the reassessment notice...

Keshav Singh vs.shambhu & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. S.N.Parashar, Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh

$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 491/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SHAMBHU &...

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.shambhu & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. S.N.Parashar, Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh

$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 491/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SHAMBHU &...

Galdhan Sangai and Anr Vs. University of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Shekhar, Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Mr. Nishant Anand, Ms. Rushna Saif

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2015. % + LPA392015 & CM No.1508/2015 (for condonation of delay) GALDHAN SANGAI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. V. Shekhar,...

Bhirug Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 504 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 248(2)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ271

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Singh, Adv.

ORDERJ.C. Gupta, J. 1. Heard Sri Kameshwar Singh, counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.2. By means of this revision the applicant has challenged the concurrent order of the Judicial Magistrate, Ballia and...

F.K. Hasheeb and Co. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales TaxCivil

Reported in : [1966]17STC38(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.T. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDERRamamurti, J.1. The main point that arises for determination in this revision petition is whether the assessment made by the assessing authority on 22nd October, 1959, could be modified only by the very assessing authority under...

Arbind Kumar Pandey Vs. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Madhup and Durganand Jha, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 4 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Principal, Mahanth Shatanand Giri...

ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Prades ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 31(2), 31(3), 226, 246, 246(3) and 254; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act 1956 - Sections 26; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India (fourth Amendment) Act, 1955; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 671; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2 and 3 to 30; Haryana Minerals (Vesting of Rights) Act, 1973; Government of India Act, 1935; Madras Electric Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1949; Bihar Land Reforms Act; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Kannan Devan Hills (Resumption of Lands) Act, 1971; Metal Corporation of India (Acquisition) Act, 1965; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acq

Reported in : AIR1980SC1955; (1980)4SCC136; [1980]3SCR331; 1981(13)LC87(SC)

D.A. Desai, J.1. Acquisition of industrial undertakings involved in manufacturing sugar, a commodity satisfying the basic necessity, in larger public interest and the attempt of the owners of the undertakings to thwart the same, paints the...

The Bihar Agriculture Marketing Board Employees Association Through It ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006 - Sections 4, 6 and 6(1); Bihar Agriculture Produce Market Act, 1960 - Sections 3; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1949; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107; Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Act, 1950; Legislative Act; Constitution of India - Articles 4, 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(5), 19(6), 31(2), 143, 212, 212(2), 213, 254, 255, 301, 302, 303, 303(1), 304 and 304(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Janam Ojha, Ram Balak Mahto, Shyama Pd. Mukherjee, Binod Kumar Kanth, K.N. Choubey and Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advs., Niranjan Kumar and Jai Prakash Verma, Advs.Kameshwar Pd. Gupta, Satya Prakash

Rajesh Balia, C.J. and Barin Ghosh, J.1. In all these writ petitions the constitutional validity of Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Repeal Act of 2006') has been challenged.The petitioners,...