Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kameshwar prasad · Page 1 of about 526 results (0.246 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1994

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and anr. Vs. Durga Prasad and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-19-1994

Subject : Arbitration

Gurusharan Sharma, J.1. This appeal, under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the judgment and decree dated 28.9.1992 passed by the 5th. Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1999

Jitendra Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-28-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 164 and 307

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Prasad, Sr. Adv. and Sunil Kumar Sinha, Adv.

A.K. Prasad, J.1. This appeal at the behest of the sole appellant Jitendra Singh is directed against the judgment and order dated 4-9-1989 in S.T. No. 118/126 of 1981-89 passed by Shri Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1998

Mishra A.K. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 92; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Prasad and Sunil Kumar Sinha, Advs.

S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J. 1. The order taking cognizance dated December 8, 1995 under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 has been impugned by the petitioners by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 16 1998

State Bank of India Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-16-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222 - Schedule - Rule 11 and 11(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 58 to 63

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Prasad, Rajesh Kumar and N. Thakur, Advs.

S.N. Jha, J. 1. These two writ petitions between the same parties involving the same point have been heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. The facts of the case may be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1997

Kashi Nath Poddar Vs. Archana Sahay and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-09-1997

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Appellant : Kameshwar Prasad and Rajesh Kumar, Advs.

Narayan Roy, J.1. I have heard counsel for the parties.2. This miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment dated 17.6.1987, passed by the 2nd Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhanbad, in Title (Compensation) Suit No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1992

India Supplies Engineering Works Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-11-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A and 14B; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ74All; (1993)1UPLBEC734

Advocate for Appellant : S.I. Srivastava and ;Kameshwar Prasad, Advs.

B.L. Yadav, J. 1. Whether the principles of natural justice were required to be followed by the State of U.P. before passing an order for imposing damages or penalty on the petitioners, the employers for their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1997

Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. Vs. Footwear and Footwear and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-15-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Prasun Kumar Deb, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 39(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, by the above named defendant-appellant against the order dated 6.11.93 passed by the Sub-Judge, 1st, Ranchi, in Miscellaneous Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2003

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Ashish Singh, Adv.

Aftab Alam, J.1. Smt. Shakuntala Devi is the widow of the Surya Bhushan Sinha who had filed this writ petition seeking direction(s) to the respondents for payment of the retiral dues. He died during the pendency...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1962

Ramrao Laxmikant Shirkhedkar Vs. Accountant General, Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-1962

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 166, 226, 309, 311 and 311(2); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955 - Rules 1(1), 4(A), 5, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 17; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 4, 8, 13, 15, 22 and 23; Essential Services Maintenance Ordinance, 1960 - Sections 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 26, 26(3), 57, 59 and 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Housing, Town Planning, Etc. Act, 1909; Madras Government Business Rules; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Railway Service (Conduct) Rules; All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1954

Reported in : AIR1963Bom121; (1963)65BOMLR65; ILR1962Bom664; 1963MhLJ205

Advocate for Appellant : D.L. Jayawant, ;S.G. Kukday, ;N.T. Khadgi, ;B.A. Masodkar and ;C.S. Dharmadhikari, Advs.

Abhyankar, J.1. This judgment will also dispose of Special Civil Application No. 240 of 1961.2. Special Civil Application No. 175 of 1961 is filed by one Shri R.D. Shirkhedkar. He was serving in the Office of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1981

Federation of Western India Cine Employees Vs. Filmalaya Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-1981

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 18

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR423; (1981)IILLJ393Bom

1. This is an appeal filed by the original defendants against the order passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay granting injunction in terms of prayer cl. (a) of the Notice of Motion taken out by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial