Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kamal trivedi · Page 1 of about 54 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 16 2004

Yashwant Venilal Sanghvi Vs. Sahdevsinh Dilubha Zala

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120B, 295, 295A, 298, 482, 505, 505(1) and 505C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173, 190, 190(1), 195, 196, 295A, 340 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 226(3); Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1927 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2006)3GLR1873

Advocate for Appellant : K.J. Shethna, Adv. in Special Criminal Application Nos. 666, 667, 668, 669, 673, 676, 677, 678, 679 and 680 of 2004 and;

A.M. Kapadia, J.1. In this batch of 11 petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners against whom First Information Reports have been registered at various police stations of different Districts of State of Gujarat,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1996

Ashok Fashions Ltd. Vs. Meghdoot Acid and Chemicals

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-03-1996

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 202, 433, 483 and 643; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 95

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas655(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal B. Trivedi and; Rakesh Gupta, Advs.

B.C. Patel, J.1. The appellant, Ashok Fashions Ltd., has filed this appeal against the order passed by the learned company judge on February 29, 1996, in Company Petition No. 25 of 1996 whereby the learned company...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2008

Garware-wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. Techfab India and 5 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-25-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 3, 10, 11A(1), 11A(2), 11A(3), 11A(7), 12, 13(2), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 23, 24, 47, 45, 48, 57(6), 64 and 113(1); Nylon Crate Bags Act; Patent Rules, 2003 - Rule 14

Reported in : LC2008(3)192

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Trivedi, Sr. Counsel and; Y.J. Trivedi, Adv. in O.J. Appeal No. 82 of 2006 and Civil Applicatio

K.A. Puj, J.1. The appellant-original plaintiff has filed this appeal challenging the interlocutory order dated 13.07.2006 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court below injunction application Exh. 5 in Civil Suit No. 04 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2006

O.N.G.C. Ltd. Vs. O.L. of Ambica Mills Co. Ltd. and 11 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 125, 125(1), 125(2), 125(3), 125(4), 433, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 483, 529, 529A, 529A(1), 530 and 531A; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act; Co-operative Societies Act; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 45, 47 and 47(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 109; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 58; Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 2; Contract Act - Sections 170 and 171; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 45, 46, 47, 49 and 49(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 142; ;Company Law

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas606(Guj); [2006]71SCL274(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Trivedi, LD. Addl. Adv. General and; K.M. Thakar, LD. Adv.

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as SONGC) appellant (original applicant) has filed this appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Kolety Gum Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 2005(184)ELT344(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Trivedi and; R.D. Dave, Advs.

ORDERA.R. Dave, J.1. RULE. Service of rule is waived by learned Senior Standing Counsel Shri Jitendra Malkan for the respondents. At the request of the learned advocates, the petition is finally heard today.2. The short question,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2000

Unisilk Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-18-2000

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 110(2) and 124

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1029; 2001(74)ECC560; 2001(134)ELT40(Guj); (2001)1GLR777

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Trivedi and; Rakesh Gupta, Advs. for Trivedi & Gupta

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.1. The petitioner is a company at Hong Kong and is an exporter of raw silk to various countries including India. 2. By this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2002

inter Continental (India) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 14, 15, 25, 25(1), 151A and 159

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC497; 2003(154)ELT37(Guj); (2002)2GLR1337

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Trivedi, Senior Adv.,; Rakesh Gupta and; Uday Josh

D.A. Mehta, J.1. The petitioners have challenged by way of this writ petition circular No. 40 of 2001-CUS dated 13-7-2001 (Exh. 'A') as being unconstitutional, illegal, ultra vires (i) Arts. 14, 19(l)(g) and (ii) the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2008

Bharat Foods Co-operative Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-27-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 - Sections 29; Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - Sections 49, 49(2) and 62; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Kerala General Sales Tax Act - Sections 10(3); Central Excise Rules, 1944; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2116

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Nanavati, Adv. for;Nanavati Associates for Petitioners 1 - 2

J.C. Upadhyaya, J.1. Rule. Service of rule is waived by Ms. Sangeeta Vishen, Ld. AGP for the respondents.Learned Counsels for the parties requested to hear and decide both the matters by way of common judgment as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2005

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-09-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 4 and 8; Bombay Home Guards Rules, 1953 - Rule 3, 4, 6 and 16; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 21, 32, 38, 39, 39A(2), 41, 42, 43, 46, 48A and 226; Home Guards Act; West Bengal Home Guards Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Patel, Ld. Sr. Counsel and; Shalin N. Mehta, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1-299 and 301-610 and;

K.M. Mehta, J.1. The petitioners - 610 in number, formally appointed by the Gujarat State under the Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947 and the Bombay Home Guards Rules, 1953, but really forming a special wing, known...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 2002

Thakar Kanaiyalal Rasiklal Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-17-2002

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 23, Rule 1; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 16, 162 and 226

Reported in : AIR2003Guj14; (2002)4GLR3569

Advocate for Appellant : Trivedi & Gupta, P.K. Jani and R.C. Jani

ORDERJayant Patel, J.1. In both these petitions and connected civil applications common questions are raised by the respective petitioners asserting their right to perform puja as popularly known as 'Bhattaji Pujari' at the temple of Arasuri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial