Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...
Chennai
Feb-24-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2006(202)ELT758(Mad)
K. Veeraraghavan, Addl. Central Government Standing Counsel
Markandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, by which the following question is sought to be referred to us for our opinion:-'Whether the Tribunal was right in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries ...
Chennai
Jan-17-2006
Excise
Customs Act - Sections 68, 71, 127, 127B and 127C(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(198)ELT6(Mad); (2006)2MLJ603
K. Veeraraghavan Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel
ORDERC. Nagappan, J.1. The writ petition is filed to quash the interim order dated 29.9.200 4 passed by the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central Excise, Mumbai. 2. The writ petition was admitted on 4.2.2005 and notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Sea Port) Vs. Registrar, Office of C and Ce a ...
Chennai
Sep-10-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28AA, 28(2) and 127B
2004(91)ECC359; 2004(164)ELT412(Mad)
K. Veeraraghavan, Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. By consent of both parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Aggrieved by the Final Order No. 2/2002 dt 28.5.2002 passed by the Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Office of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Advertising Club Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN287(Mad)
N.B.B. Swamy, Md. Ibrahim Ali, B.S. Gnanadesikan, Kempraj and K. Uppill, for the Assessee M. Chandrasekaran and K. Veeraraghavan, for the Revenue
Sirpurkar, J.This judgment shall dispose of W.P. No. 1545 of 1999, etc., since all the writ petitions involve a common question regarding the 'constitutional validity' of the 'service tax' levied on the 'taxable service' provided to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAirlines Agents Association Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN298(Mad)
C. Natarajan and M. Md. Ibrahim Ali, for the Assessee Chandrasekaran and K. Veeraraghavan, for the Revenue
Sirpurkar, J. These writ petitions are filed by Airlines Agents Association, Chennai and some air travel agents. The petitioners pray for a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ or order in the nature of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGda Security (P) Ltd Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Nov-22-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN128(Mad)
M.S. Sampath, N.B.N. Swamy, V. Chockalingam and P. Saravana Sowmiyan, for the Assessee K. Veeraraghavan, for the Revenue
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. This judgment shall govern the above-mentioned four petitions, which have been filed by various 'Security and Detective Agencies', challenging the provisions of sections 66 and 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. In fact,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Vs. Shanmughavel V. Commissioner of Central Excise
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN274(Mad)
K.C. Rajappa, for the Assessee M. Chandrasekaran and K. Veeraraghavan, for the Revenue
Sirpurkar, J. W.P. No. 7273 of 1998 has been filed by the Chairman, Institution of Valuers, Tamil Nadu Zone, which institution was constituted in 1968 and is a registered society. The members of the petitioner institute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.C. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Chennai
Jan-20-2004
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57G(2); Constitution of India - Article 14
2004(93)ECC569
Sriram Panchu, Senior counsel for ;T. Mohan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. I.T.C. Limited has filed the above writ petition for declaration, declaring Second Proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules inserted by M.F. (D.R.) Notification No. 28/95-CE (NT) dated 29.6.95 as ultra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTanfac Industries Ltd., Rep. by M.H. Upadhyaya, Joint President Vs. Mo ...
Chennai
Feb-05-2003
Customs
Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(155)ELT251(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar, SC
ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. In W.P. No. 13045/99, the writ petitioner M/s. TANFAC Industries Ltd., has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for and quash the proceedings of the first respondent, Monopolies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Itc Ltd.
Chennai
Mar-21-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2005(185)ELT114(Mad); (2005)2MLJ158
K. Veeragahavan, SCGSC
ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application on behalf of the revenue under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, by which the following questions have been sought to be referred to us for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »