Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k v venkatapathy · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1994

K. Anbazhagan Vs. M. Kannappan and 10 ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-26-1994

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38(3) and 41

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC47

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Venkatapathi, ;R. Shanmugasundaram and ;P. Wilson, Advs.

ORDERGovardhan, J.1. The applicant/plaintiff in his affidavit contends briefly as follows:-The applicant has filed the suit against the defendants for permanent injunction in his capacity as the General Secretary of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, herein after called...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1994

Habibunnisa Akthar and Another Vs. S. and S. Industries and Enterprise ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas593(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Venkatapathi, Adv.

Pratap Singh, J.1. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in C.C. No. 2889 of 1993, on the file of the XVIIth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, have filed this petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1991

V.P. Revathi Vs. Asha Bagree

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas372(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Venkatapathy, Adv.

Pratap Singh, J. 1. The accused in C.C. Nos. 2489 and 2490 of 1990 on the file of the VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Madras, has filed these petitions under section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, praying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2004

T.S. Bellieraj Vs. Vinodhini Krishnakumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2004

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 60 and 65; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Sections 8; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Specific Relif Act, 1963 - Sections 32, 33 and 34; Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 40; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A

Reported in : AIR2004Mad319; 2004(2)CTC510; (2004)4MLJ191

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Venkatapathy, Senior Counsel for ;A. Bobbie, Adv.

ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. This appeal was posted today for admission and I heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant.2. The first defendant in the suit O.S. No. 31 of 1996 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2015

M.Prakasam Vs. The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23. 1.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.15945 of 2014 & M.P(MD)N o.1 of 2015 M.Prakasam ... Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Vathalai Police Station, Trichy District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2001

K. Madalaimuthu and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-24-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ254

ORDERMalai Subramanian, J.1. The petitioners in these three petitions challenge the common order passed by the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in O.As.Nos.779 of 1995,1067 of 1995 and 1068 of 1995.The petitioner in W.P. No. 16806 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

B.K. Gunasekaran Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Sections 33A, 47A(1) and 47(A)(6) - Schedule - Articles 23, 55, 55C and 55(D); ;Registration Act, 1908; ;Conduct Rules - Rule 20(1); ;Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980

Advocate for Appellant : N.R. Chandran, Adv. for; R. Natarajan, Adv. in W.P. No. 14682/09,;

ORDERT.S. Sivagnanam, J.1. By consent the Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal. Since, the petitioner in all the three writ petitions is the same person and the issue involved in all the three writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1997

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1997

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 - Sections 3, 3(1), 12, 15A and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 254, 255, 300A and 301 to 304; Central Act; Constitutional Law; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Madras High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1965 - Rules 1A and 2(4); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gandhi, ;K.M. Vijayan, Sr. Advs., ;K. Ravi, ;M. Palani, ;R. Janakiraman, ;M.S. Subramaniam, ;M. Sundar, ;G. Rajagopalan, ;V. Raghavachari, ;Mythili Srinivasan and ;R. Srinivas, Advs.

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. All these actions-this Batch of Writ Petitions-filed by Importers-Dealers or otherwise - of motor vehicles into local area from any 1997/3/17 place outside the State of Tamil Nadu for use or sale herein- owning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2005

T. Padmavathy Vs. Western Exports India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : DRAT Madras

Decided on : Oct-14-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : I(2006)BC206

That in respect of the amount due by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent Bank namely Indian Overseas Bank, instituted a suit in the High Court of Madras, and the suit was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1998

Vijayan K. and ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-15-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ1083Mad

Advocate for Appellant : K. Chandru, Standing Counsel for ;D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. These writ appeals are directed against the common order passed in W.P. Nos. 718 and 1136 of 1990 by the learned single Judge dated January 6, 1992 dismissing those writ petitions.2. The prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial