Advanced Search Results
The Public Prosecutor Vs. Chaniappa Pujary
Chennai
Nov-28-1950
Narcotics
Madras Prohibition Act, 1937 - Sections 4(1) and 4(2)
AIR1951Mad703; (1950)2MLJ168
Party in person
Somasundaram, J.1. This is an appeal sought to be filed by the Public Prosecutor against the order of acquittal passed by the Stationary Sub-Mag. Puttur in C. C. No. 546 of 1950.2. The prosecution was for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrinivasa Aiyar Vs. Saraswathi Ammal
Chennai
Sep-24-1951
Criminal
Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949 - Sections 4(2); Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 15, 25, 25(1) and 25(2); Government of India Act, 1935; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195(4) and 198; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 114, 493 to 496
AIR1952Mad193; (1951)2MLJ649
G. Gopalaswami, ;K.V. Ramaseshan and ;C.F. Lonis, Advs. for ;M.K. Nambiar, Adv., ; V. Venkataraman, Adv. ;Reddi, Advs., ;C.A. Vaidhialingam, ;M.V. Ganpathi, ;A. Nagorajan and ;P.S. Kailasam, Advs.;Adv
1. These eight petitions have been posted before us as they raise the important question of the validity of the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949, Madras Act VI of 1949 (hereinafter called the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: K. Palani Moopan
Chennai
Mar-15-1951
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304; Madras Borstal Schools Act, 1926 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367 and 423
AIR1952Mad172; (1951)1MLJ679
K.V. Ramaseshan, Adv.
Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is an appeal filed by Palani Moopan, the fourth accused in S. C. No. 64 of 1950 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. He is a boy aged 19...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kandaswami Koundan Vs. Sanni Krishnama Naidu
Chennai
Mar-04-1949
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 89; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(21)
AIR1951Mad790
K.V. Ramaseshan, Adv.
ORDERMack, J.1. Petnr. who was not a party to the decree filed an appln. under Order 21 Rule 89, C. P. C. to set aside a Ct. sale in execution. The Dist. Munsif & the Dist....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Venkataswami Aiya
Chennai
Jan-19-1953
Criminal
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 27, 35, 64 and 70 - Schedule - Article 58
AIR1953Mad941; (1953)1MLJ658
K.V. Ramaseshan, Adv.
ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This criminal revision case is preferred against the conviction and sentence in C. C. No. 10 of 1951 on the file of the Additional First Class Magistrate, Kollegal, from which C. A. No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›