Advanced Search Results
Virabhadrayya Garu Vs. Mahalakshmamma Garu and Others
Privy Council
Nov-08-1929
Land Acquisition
W.H. Upjohn and K.V.L. Narasimham, for Appellant ; Sidney Smith, L.De Gruyther and E.B. Raikes, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak; Solicitors for Respondent, Douglas Grant and Dold and Josselyn and Elwes.
LORD BUCKMASTER: For the purpose of the few remarks that are necessary to dispose of this matter, the Board assumes, in accordance with the instructions of counsel, that the map before them is a map which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMt. Sat Bharai Vs. Barkhurdar Shah and Another
Privy Council
Nov-13-1933
Land Acquisition
A.M. Dunne and W. Wallach, for Appellant; L. DeGruyther, K.V.L. Narasimham and Zafrullah Khan, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Sam Singh Nchra.
Sir George Lowndes: The appeal arises out of a suit brought by the appellant to recover possession of certain immovable properties situated in the Jhang District of the Punjab which are said to be of considerable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMundacheri Koman Vs. Thachangat Puthan Vittil Achuthan Nair and Others
Privy Council
Jul-26-1934
Land Acquisition
K.V.L. Narasimham, for Appellant; A.M. Dunne and W. Wallach, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Harold, Shepherd; Solicitors for Respondents, The Solicitor, India Office.
Sir John Wallis: In this case the three plaintiffs who describe themselves as Hindu Nairs residing within half a mile of the seven plaint temples, and as habitual worshippers at the said temples, instituted seven suits,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Secy. of State Vs. Velivelapalli Mallayya and Others
Privy Council
Jul-29-1932
Land Acquisition
L. DeGruyther and W. Wallach, for Appellant ; Dawson Miller and K.V.L. Narasimham, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, The Solicitor India Office; Solicitors for Respondents, Douglas Grant and Dold.
Sir Dinshah Mulla: The principal respondents in this appeal are the archakas of the temple of Sri Krita Kritya Rameswara Swami Varu in a place known as Gudimala Khandrika which forms part, as would appear from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJulien Marret Vs. Mahomed Khaleel Shirazi and Sons and Others
Privy Council
Nov-15-1929
Sales Tax
L.De Gruyther and K.V.L. Narasimham, for Appellant; D.N. Pritt, Sidney Smith, H.Du Parry and E.B. Raikes, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Chapman-Walker and Shephard; Solicitors for Respondents, Douglas Grant and Dold and Sanderson Lee and Co.
LORD ATKIN: Their Lordships find it unnecessary to call upon counsel for the respondents in this case. This is an appeal from the High Court of Madras dismissing an appeal by the plaintiff, Mr. Marret. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSitalakshmi Ammal Vs. Venkata Subrahmanian
Privy Council
Feb-25-1930
Land Acquisition
W.R. Upjohn and B. Dube, for Appellant; K.V.L. Narasimham, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak; Solicitors for Respondent, Chapman Walker and Shepherd.
Lord Atkin: This is an appeal from the High Court of Judicature at Madras in a suit in which the infant plaintiff suing by his next friend, his father, Gopalkrishna Ayyar, claimed from the defendants possession...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMudanna Virayya Vs. Mudanna Adenna and Others
Privy Council
Nov-12-1929
Civil
K.V.L. Narasimham, for Appellant ; C.S. Smith, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Douglas Grant and Dold ; Solicitors for Respondent, Chapman Walker and Shepherd.
LORD TOMLIN: This is an appeal against a decree dated 18th November 1924, of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, modifying a decree dated 19th January 1922, and made by the Additional Subordinate Judge of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA Pleader Vs. the Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Privy Council
Feb-24-1931
Land Acquisition
A.M. Dunne and K.V.L. Narasimham, for Petitioner. W. Wallach, for Respondents. Solicitors for Petitioner, Hy. S.L. Polak; Solicitors for Respondents, The Solicitor, India Office.
Lord Macmillan: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, on 25th June 1930, found the petitioner guilty of certain charges made against him under Art. 8, Letters Patent, of the Court, and ordered his name to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamachandra Deo Mahaharajulungaru Vs. Sri Lakshiminarasimha Bahadur an ...
Privy Council
Mar-20-1934
Land Acquisition
W.H. Upjohn and J.M. Parikh, for Appellant; K.V.L. Narasimham and C. Sidney Smith, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co., Solicitors for Respondents, Harold Shephard and T.L. Wilson and Co.
Sir John Wallis: By a well-advised compromise made between the appellant, the Maharajah of Jeypore, a zemindar in the Madras Presidency, and the principal respondents, the Zemindar of Pachipenta and his two minor sons and ordered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPakala Venkanna and Others Vs. Sri Rao Swetachalapati Ramakrishna Rang ...
Privy Council
Feb-10-1931
Land Acquisition
L.De Gruyther and K.V.L. Narasimham, for Appellants; A.M. Dunne, and B. Dube, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Chapman Walker and Shephard; Solicitors for Respondent, Hy. S.L. Polak.
Sir George Lowndes: The dispute in this appeal is as to the rights of the parties over an irrigation channel known as the Sayauna Batte in the Vizagapatam District of Madras. The plaintiff, the respondent before...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »