Advanced Search Results

In Re: Destruction of Public and Private Properties Vs. State of A.P. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : PDPP Act - Sections 5 ;Evidence Act; Agricultural Marketing Act, 1958; Police Act, 1861; Essential Commodities Act; Excise and Customs Act; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Press Council Act, 1978; Cinematography Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 32 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437

Reported in : AIR2009SC2266; 2009(57)BLJR2292; 2009CriLJ2807; JT2009(6)SC1; (2009)5SCC212; 2009(5)LC2478(SC):2009AIRSCW3000

Advocate for Appellant : G.E. Vahanvati, SGI,; Manish Singhvi, AAG, (Rajasthan),; R.

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Taking a serious note of various instances where there was large scale destruction of public and private properties in the name of agitations, bandhs, hartals and the like, suo motu proceedings were initiated...

Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 313

Reported in : (2002)10SCC187

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. The appellant stands convicted under three sections of three different enactments. Principal among them is Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The other provisions are...

Hemant Bhimappa Gadivaddar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2000(9)SCC732; 2001SCC(Cri)694

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. This is a right of appeal of the accused as the High Court has reversed an acquittal. We appointed Mr. R. K. Maheshwari, Advocate as amicus curiae. He must be...

Neerukonda Parabrahma Murthy and anr. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 34; Indian Evidence Act 1872 - Section 45

Reported in : (1997)11SCC408

M.M. Punchhi,; S.P. Bharucha and; K.T. Thomas, JJ.1. The appellants between them are father and son. They stand convicted of the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murdering the wife of the...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Umrani Swaminathan Laxman

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Section 3(1)

Reported in : (1997)11SCC426

M.K. Mukharji and; K.T. Thomas, JJ.1. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. Pursuant to an order of detention dated 10-5-1995, made by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of...

S.A. Vengadamma and ors. Vs. Jitendra P. Vora and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyTenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Section 3(ff)

Reported in : JT1998(9)SC421; (1997)11SCC334

M.M. Punchhi and; K.T. Thomas, JJ.1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel at length.2. The High Court of Karnataka upheld partial eviction of the tenant-respondent, preserving the truncated tenancy to a room, left with him. There were...

Kiran Kumar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Sections 389, 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 460, 376, 325, 506

Reported in : (2001)9SCC211

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant stands convicted under Sections 460, 376, 325 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum sentence imposed on him is imprisonment for a period of...

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 100

Reported in : (2002)10SCC493

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. Issue notice.2. Mr Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Advocate accepts notice for the contesting respondents.3. Leave granted.4. We heard Mr Harish Salve, learned Solicitor-General for India who argued for the appellant and...

Shamshad Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 304, 302

Reported in : (2002)10SCC576

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.B. Singh

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. We heard Mr B.B. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr Praveen Swarup, learned counsel for the State of U.P. The concurrent finding on facts do not require interference...

State of A.P. Vs. Yelamati Venkaataraju

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 332

Reported in : (2001)10SCC728

K.T. Thomas and; M.B. Shah, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the State of Andhra Pradesh. As nobody is appearing for the respondent we considered the cause shown for the delay and we condone this delay.2. Leave...