Advanced Search Results
Parkside Explosives and Industries Ltd. (Now Known as Matheson Bosanqu ...
Chennai
Jan-17-2005
Direct Taxation
[2005]278ITR561(Mad)
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, for the Assessee. K. Subramaniam, for the Revenue.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law :'2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the appellant was not entitled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. South India Viscose Ltd.
Chennai
Jul-08-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]143TAXMAN360(Mad)
K. Subramaniam, for the Revenue P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, for the Assessee.
N. Kannadasan J.The above appeal was admitted, whereby the following substantial questions of law were formulated.'(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Rajendran and Others
Chennai
Sep-29-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 332, 342, 365 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 317
1996CriLJ1956
N.T. Vanamamalai, Sr. Counsel, for ;R. Karthikeyan, ;M/s D. Veerasekaran and ;Nainar Mohammed, ;M/s. P. Sivathanu, ;Manoharan and ;M. Jagadeesan, Advs., ;K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;M/s. V. Rathi
Arunachalam, J.1. A storm, not one natural, had blown over the campus, which accommodates the Courts of certain Metropolitan Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates, in Saidapet on 26-7-1995. The unusual impact of the storm had led to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M. Natarajan Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Spe, Cbi, Acb Chennai
Supreme Court of India
May-07-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 86 to 98; Indirect Tax Act; Direct Tax Act; Conservation of Foreign Exchange And Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974; Kerala Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1986; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 239, 245 and 482; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 90(1), 127H, 132 and 136; Constitution of India - Article 246; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Gift Tax Act, 1958; Income Tax Act, 1961; Interest Tax Act, 1974; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987
(2008)217CTR(SC)1; 2008(120)ECC141; 2008(156)LC141(SC); 2008(226)ELT679(SC); JT2008(6)SC451; 2008(8)SCALE290; (2008)8SCC413; (2008)3SCC(Cri)507.
K. Subramaniam, Sr. Adv.,; R. Jayaseelan,; E.C. Agrawala,;
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The challenge in these appeals is to the common judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court whereby the High Court has dismissed the Criminal Revision Case No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), Represented by the Director General, All India R ...
Chennai
Apr-29-2005
ServiceConstitution
Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 11(1); Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 33; Constitution of India - Articles 74, 74(1), 77, 77(1), 77(2), 77(3), 166 and 166(1)
2005(2)CTC661; (2005)3MLJ310
V.T. Gopalan, Additional Solicitor General for Udayakumar, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 24444 to 24451/2001, 30047/2002 and 32427/2004, ;T.K. Ramkumar, Adv. in W.P. No. 45315/2002, ;K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel f
ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The first respondent in W.P.Nos. 24444/2001 to 24451/2001 is the respective pensioner retired from Government of India service. The writ petitioner in W.P.No. 14913/2002 is the first respondent/pensioner in W.P.No. 24450/2001. The first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Thirunavukkarasu and anr. Vs. J. Jayalalitha and anr.
Chennai
Aug-27-1997
ElectionCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Act, 1968; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 16
1997(3)CTC229
Shanthi Bhushan, Sr. Counsel for ;S.R. Arthur & A. Mohandoss, ;K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Balasubramaniam, Adv. and ;Maya Thevar, Adv. for ;S. Jayakumar and ;R. Balasubramaniam, Advs.
ORDERShivaraj Patil, J.1. The defendant in C.S. No. 322 of 1997 has filed O.S.A. No. 179 of 1997 aggrieved by the order dated 17.6.1997 made by the learned single Judge in Application No. 356 of 1997...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax. Vs. M/S. Indian Gospel Fellowship Trus ...
Chennai
Aug-17-2010
Direct Taxation
Mr.K.Subramaniam, Adv.
1. The Revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated 27.11.2009 passed in ITA.No.1417/Mds/2009, whereby the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, dated 20.08.2009 passed under Section 12AA of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.Ramamoorthy Vs. the Secretary to Government
Chennai
Apr-09-2012
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227
Mr.K.Subramaniam, Adv.
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to forbear the second respondent herein from proceeding further on the basis of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Kaliamman Endowment Trust Vs. the Tamil Nadu Temple Administration ...
Chennai
Dec-15-1995
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Act, 1991 - Sections 7(B)
1996(2)CTC313
K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;T.N. Manikanteswaran, Adv.
ORDERShivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Sri. K. Subramaniam, learned Senior Counsel submitted that the impugned order of the third respondent dated 5.9.1995 based on the communication of the second respondent dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sivabala Devi
Chennai
Jun-24-2010
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 132, 132A, 139, 139(1), 140A, 142(1), 143, 143(2), 143(3), 144, 145, 147, 148, 158B to 158BI, 207, 208, 209, 210 and 234B
K. Subramaniam, Sr. Standing Counsel
F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The brief facts which are required to be stated are that the respondent assessee is the wife of Mr. S.D.Rajandran, an officer in M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Limited. She is the younger...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »