Advanced Search Results
Abdulgafar A. Nadiadwala Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ...
Mumbai
Mar-29-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC, 80HHC(4A), 80HHF, 80HHF(1), 80HHF(3) and 80HHF(5); Constitution of India (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1982; Sales Tax Laws; Income Tax Rules - Rule 9A, 9A(7), 9B and 9B(6)
(2004)188CTR(Bom)232; [2004]267ITR488(Bom)
K. Shivram, ;K. Gopal, ;P.K. Parida, ;S.N. Inamdar, ;P.Y. Vaidya, ;V.H. Patil, ;A.P. Sathe and ;Hiro Rai, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the assessee gives rise to a highly debated but interesting intricate, legal question as to whether or not the appellant-assessee (hereinafter referred to as the 'assessee') was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindrajit and Co. Vs. Girijan Co-operative Corpn. Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-24-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]107TAXMAN179(Bom)
K. Shivram Keshar and V.H. Patil, for the Petitioner
ORDERSaraf, J.By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the constitutional validity of section 44AC and section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioner contends that these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShip Scrap Traders and ors. Vs. Cit and ors.
Mumbai
May-04-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)168CTR(Bom)489
A.K Jasani with S.S. Shetty, K Shivram with K Gopal i/b Rustomji & Ginwala & M. Subramaniam with V.S. Khadade, for the Assessees R.V. Desai with P.S. Jetly & J.P. Deodhar i/b H.D.
V.C. Daga, J.IntroductionThe issue in the present batch of cases is one of some potential general significance relating to interpretation of the words 'manufactures or produces any articles or thing' in relation to the deduction under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Suresh K. Bhagat Vs. Asstt. Cit
Mumbai
Jan-29-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(Mumbai)16
K Shivram, for the Assessee Boota Singh, for the Revenue.
ORDERR.P. TOLAni J.M.:This set of nine appeals pertain to same assessee. Issues are inter-related. Hence, disposed of by this common order.2. Appeal No. 12/Bom/1995 for assessment year 1992-93 is taken first. Grounds raised are as under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askito Vs. Rajpal Singh
Mumbai
Mar-03-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)91TTJ(Mumbai)993
Sanjay Rai, for the Revenue K. Shivram & P.K. Parida, for the Assessee.
ORDERJAIDEV, A.M.:These cross-appeals are directed against Commissioner (Appeals)'s order dated 1-10-1996.ITA No. 260/Mum/1997 : (Revenue's appeal) :2. The following ground of appeal has been raised'On the facts and in law, the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-XXX, Mumbai, has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmritraj S. Punamiya, Huf Vs. Ito, Ward 24(15)
Allahabad
May-03-2005
Direct Taxation
[2005]3SOT547(NULL)
K. Shivram, for the Appellant , R.S. Srivastav, for the Respondent
ORDERD.C. Agarwal, A.M.1. In this appeal the assessee has raised the following grounds:'1. One the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion Of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2024
Education
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV __
2024 INSC754Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 Union of India & Ors. … Appellants Versus Rajeev Bansal …Respondent WITH C.A. No.8631/2024 C.A. No.9270/2024 C.A. No.8632/2024 C.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJatIn (Alias Rajesh) Khanna Vs. First Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Apr-24-1992
Direct Taxation
(1993)45ITD448(Mum.)
1. This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 22-3-1985 passed by the CIT (Appeals)-II, Bombay. Briefly, the facts in this case are that the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Nagpal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Feb-28-2005
Land Acquisition
(2005)94TTJ(Mum.)745
1. IT(SS)A No. 266/Mum/1997 is an appeal by assessee, Anil Nagpal, for the block period 1st April, 1986 to 15th Oct., 1996 is directed against the block assessment dt. 31st Oct., 1997 framed by AO under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. M/S. Brahma Associates
Mumbai
Feb-22-2011
Income Tax
Income Tax Act,1961 - Section 80IB(10); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Section 2(ea)
Mr. Vimal Gupta; Abhay Ahuja, Advs.
1. Although this appeal was admitted on 01/12/2009 on only question, at the hearing of the appeal counsel on both sides agreed that all the questions raised in the appeal be admitted and heard on merits....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »