Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k sasikumar adv · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 12 1991

S. Damodaran Pillai Vs. K. Nanthedu Bava

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-12-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 10; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1992Ker212

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sasikumar, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioner in insolvency petition 1/87 on the file of Munsiffs Court, Mavelikkara is the appellant in this miscellaneous second appeal. The appellant as the judgment-debtor in O.S.57/85 of Munsiff's Court, Adoor, was liable to pay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1993

C.V. Alexander Vs. Joseph Chacko

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-12-1993

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 139

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas368(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sasikumar, Adv.

K.T. Thomas, J. 1. The appellant was the complainant in the lower court. He filed this appeal in challenge of the order of acquittal of the respondent of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2007

P. Damodaran Vs. Cherkalam Abdulla and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-07-2007

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 15 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215

Reported in : AIR2007Ker153; 2007(4)AIRKarR6; 2007CrLJNOC609(FB)(Ker).

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sasikumar, Adv.

J.B. Koshy, J.1. The preliminary point to be decided in this case is whether the proceedings for contempt is barred by limitation in view of Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 1992

Prasadh Kumar Vs. Ravindran

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-01-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3203; II(1992)DMC162

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sasikumar, Adv.;None

Krishnamoorthy, J.1. In both these Original Petitions a commonquestion arises and accordingly they are disposed of by a common judgment.The question involved in O.P. No. 3771 of 1992 is as to whether thepetitioner is entitled to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Vasudevan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323, 354 and 451; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 357(1)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3173; 2006(2)KLT1019

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sasikumar. Adv.

ORDERV.K. Bali, C.J.1. Petitioner - Vasudevan was tried for the offences under Sections 451 and 354 of Indian Penal Code. After the trial on the offences mentioned above, he was held guilty and convicted under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2010

Vinod Vijayachandran Nair; Nandanam. Vs. State of Kerala, and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-25-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4(1), 5A

Advocate for Appellant : SRI.K.SASIKUMAR, Adv.

1. The petitioner is the owner of a parcel of land, 8.09 ares in extent, situated in Re-survey No.8/2-5 of Pandalam Village in Pathanamthitta District. The said land lies close to the Pandalam Valiyakoikkal Temple. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial