Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k santhanam · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.077 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 25 2013

Saravanan Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-25-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 25.06.2013 Coram The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.9391 & 9723 of 2013 W.P.No.9391 of 2013 ------------------- Saravanan .. Petitioner vs.1. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1958

Jagannath Prasad Saxena Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1958

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311 and 363; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1959MP136; (1959)ILLJ512MP

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Swarup and ;G.P. Singh, Advs.

M. Hidayatullah, C.J. 1. The petitioner Jagannath Prasad Saxena was serving as an assistant geologist in the Vindhya Pradesh State till 18th June 1956 when he received an order of the Lieutenant Governor, Vindhya Pradesh, terminating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1981

Arasu Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-22-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1138

Advocate for Appellant : K. Santhanam, Adv.

1. This is a petition under S. 438, Cr.P.C. In that, the petition itself is signed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, wherein the grounds for releasing the petitioner on anticipatory bail...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 1972

Chandrasekaran Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-1972

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1973]31STC103(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Natarajan, Adv. for ;K. Santhanam, Adv.

ORDERKrishnaswamy Reddy, J.1. This reference by the District Magistrate, of course, raises an interesting question. What happened in this case is this : There were certain amounts in the deposit of the court to the credit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2003

H.R. Somappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Decided on : Apr-30-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(1)SLJ171CAT

1. The applicant was appointed as Tradesman 'B' on 20.4.1987 in the Indian Rare Earths Ltd., Rare Materials Plant (RMP), Mysore (Govt. of India Undertaking), on application submitted by him in response to the advertisement No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1978

T. Khande Rao and Sons and Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-14-1978

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31 and 226

Reported in : AIR1979Kant71; ILR1979KAR1097

1. In these writ petitions, under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the Constitutional validity of the Karnataka Vacant Lands in Urban Areas (Prohibition of Alienation) Act, 1975 (Karnataka Act No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1985

Hotel Dwaraka, Hyderabad Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-1985

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act 1957 - Sections 2(1), 4, 5, 6 and 7

Reported in : [1985]58STC241(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman, ;M.P. Chandra Mouli, ;S. Dasaratharama Reddi, ;S. Krishna Rao, ;S.R. Ashok, ;G. Vedantha Rao, ;C. Poornaiah, ;D. Sethurama Reddy, ;J. Eswara Prasad, ;K. Ramesh Babu, ;P. Venkatarama Redd

Chennakesav Reddy, Ag. C.J. 1. This big batch of writ petitions is spawned by the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act. 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Amendment Act'). The petitioners are hoteliers or licensees of bars and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1991

Sub-committee of Judicial Accountability Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-1991

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 55, 61, 93, 100, 105, 107, 108, 109, 118, 119, 121, 122, 124, 192, 196, 212, 213, 217(1), 226, 227, 235, 262, 286, 317 and 363; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 6, 39(2), 40, 41(2), 200 and 220; Parliamentary (Judges) Commission of Inquiry Act, 1988; Government of India Act, 1935; Central Provinces and Berar Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 63; Inquiry Act, 1968 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1992SC320; JT1991(6)SC184; 1991(2)SCALE844; (1991)4SCC699; [1991]Supp2SCR1

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Attorney General,; Altaf Ahmad, Addl. Solicitor General,;

ORDERB.C. Ray, J.These writ petitions raise certain constitutional issues of quite some importance bearing on the construction of Articles 121 and 124 of the Constitution of India and of the 'The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968' even...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1974

Samsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 53, 74(1), 77, 77(3), 123, 131, 154, 166, 166(3), 213, 235, 311, 311(2), 317, 324, 352(1), 356 and 360; Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rule 9; Punjab Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 - Rule 7(3)

Reported in : AIR1974SC2192; (1974)IILLJ465SC; (1974)2SCC831; [1975]1SCR814; 1975(1)SLJ1(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi,; S.P. Agarwala,; A.T.M. Sampath,;

A.N. Ray, C.J.1. These two appeals are from the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.2. Appellants joined the Punjab Civil Service (Judicial Branch). They were both on probation.3. By an order dated 27th April,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1984

R.S. Nayak Vs. A.R. Antulay Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-16-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Partnership Act - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(1), 21, 136, 170, 178 to 187, 187(1), 194(3), 195, 203, 204, 248, 266 and 368; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 200; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 7, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21, 21(3), 21(7), 21(12), 109, 120-B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 165-A, 384 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Maharashtra Legislature Members

Reported in : AIR1984SC684; AIR1984SC991; (1984)86BOMLR365; 1984CriLJ613; 1984CriLJ819; 1984(1)Crimes568(SC); 1984(1)Crimes926(SC); 1984(1)SCALE198; 1984(1)SCALE583; (1984)2SCC183; (1984; AIR 1984 SC 84

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani,; P.R. Vakil and; Ashok Desai, Advs

D.A. Desai, J.1. Respondent Abdul Rehman Antulay (hereinafter referred to as the accused) was the Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra from 1980 till he submitted his resignation on January 12, 1982, which became effective...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial