Advanced Search Results
Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Shri Vijay V. Meghani
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-29-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)106ITD362(Mum.)
1. These cross appeals relating to the assessment years 1991-92 and 1993-94 are disposed of by this common order as under: 2. This Departmental appeal arises from the order dated 26^th December, 2001 of the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-05-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)106ITD589(Mum.)
1. These 12 appeals which arise from the respective orders of the learned CIT(A) in connection with the proceedings under Section 201(1) and 201(1A), involving common facts, are disposed of by this common order.2. The facts,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRbf Rig Corpn. Lic (Rbfrc) as Agent Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Nov-30-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)297ITR228(Delhi)
1. The Special Bench has been constituted Under Section 255(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the recommendation of regular bench to dispose of the following issue: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S. Nagaraj Vs. S. Govindaswamy and anr.
Chennai
Mar-07-1983
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rule 2(1)
AIR1984Mad212; (1983)IIMLJ314
D. Peter Francis, Adv.
Gokulkrishna, J.1. This original side appeal' filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent arises out of the order of Sbaturnikbam. J. -dated m12-1982, made in Appln. No. 4651 of 1982, revoking the leave to granted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamsammal Vs. P.V. Thakkar
Chennai
Sep-23-1981
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20
AIR1982Mad108
R. Krishnamurthi and ;K.S. Sundaram, Advs.
1. The defendant is the appellant. The respondent herein filed the suit for specific performance of the contract of sale D/- 20-10-1974, with the following averments: The appellant defendant is the owner of a house property...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mathali Goundar
Chennai
Nov-14-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342(1)
AIR1952Mad812; (1952)IMLJ276
K.S. Sundaram, Adv.
Somasundaram, J. 1. The Additional Sessions Judge of Salem has found the accused guilty of murder of one Sellappa Goundan, uncle of the accused and sentenced him to death. 2. The occurrence is said to have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S.Sundaram. Vs. S.Viswanathan
Chennai
Jul-04-2012
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Order 7 Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 19(2)
Mr.Ravi, Adv
This Appeal is preferred against the order of this Court dated 8.6.2010 made in C.S.No.157 of 2011.JUDGMENTM.DURAISWAMY,J,1. Challenging the judgment and decree of the learned single Judge made in C.S.No.157 of 2001 on the file of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt.S.V.Jayamma vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-09-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION No.58292/2014 (LA-BDA) C/W WRIT PETITION No.11782/2024 (LA-BDA) IN W.P. No.58292/2014 BETWEEN:1. SMT....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri V Srinivasa Murthy vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Apr-08-2024
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10331 OF 2013 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:1. SRI V. SRINIVASA MURTHY, AGED...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›