Advanced Search Results

Present:- Mr. K.S. Sidhu Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others …re ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.S. Sidhu

Crl. Misc. No.M-22227 of 2013 & -1- Crl. Misc. No.M-31065 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATESOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: May 8, 2014 1) Crl. Misc. No.M-22227 of 2013...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Intnl. Security and Intell ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14, 30, 33, 39, 39(1), 39(4) and 41; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 41, Rule 22 and 22(1); Hyderabad Jagirdars Debt Settlement Act, 1952 - Sections 47 to 49; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 98, 99 and 116A; Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940 - Sections 38; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1907 - Sections 46 and 47

Reported in : AIR2003SC1515; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)333; 2003(1)ARBLR432(SC); 102(2003)DLT922(SC); JT2003(2)SC103; 2003(1)SCALE771; (2004)3SCC250; [2003]1SCR951; 2003(1)UJ562(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Adv.,; Maldeep Sidhu,; Mayank Goel and;

Leave granted in both the SLPs.The respondent-International Security and Intelligence Agency Ltd. entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi whereby the former undertook to provide security services etc. to the latter. The agreement...

Akhil Sibal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi480

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Anand,; N.S. Vashisth,; K.S. Sidhu,;

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Value of agricultural land to its owner and to the peasant alike is as valuable as their life, beside being sentimentally attached to it, such land provides them their livelihood. thereforee, when such...

Smt. Swaran Lata Vs. Shri P.P. Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 276, 280, 281 and 295; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 52, 58 and 61; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 14, Rule 5 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 135(2006)DLT362

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Adv.,; Maldeep Sidhu and;J.P. Gupta Advs

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this order I propose to decide two applications, being I.A.Nos.10301 & I.A.No.10302/2006. The first application is filed by the petitioner under Order XIV Rule 5 read with Section 151 of the Code...

Dda and ors. Vs. Rama Associates Pvt Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Ms. Maldeep Sidhu

$~15&16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17. 01.2013 + RFA(OS) 5/2013 DDA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Maldeep Sidhu and Sh....

Dda and ors. Vs. Pragati Construction Co. P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Ms. Maldeep Sidhu

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17. 01.2013 + RFA(OS) 8/2013 DDA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Maldeep Sidhu and Sh....

Smt. Chandra Prabha Vs. Shri Satish C. Sharma and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Ms. Maldeep Sidhu

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.138/2012 (O.VI R.17 CPC) in CS (OS) 526/2007 Reserved on:25. h October, 2013 Decided on:12. h March,, 2014 % SMT. CHANDRA PRABHA Through: ........

Brijmohini Vs. Surinder Chadha

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi1042

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Sidhu,; S.C. Manchanda,; Mehar Singh,;

S.K. Kapur, J.(1) Shrimati Brij Mohini (hereinafter referred to as the wife) filed a petition under section 12 of the Hindu A Marriage Act, 1955, against her husband Surinder Chadha on 8th February, 1966. The prayer...

State Vs. Moti Lal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 32

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi286

Advocate for Appellant : B. Dayal and; D.R. Sethi, Advs

Jagjit Singh, J. (1) Motilal, proprietor of Rajasthani Ayurvedic Pharmacy, Subzimandi, Delhi, was tried and convicted by Shri M. M. Aggarwal, a Magistrate of the First Class, for contravention of the provisions of section 18(c), 18(a)(i)...

The Registrar, Indian Council of Arbitration Vs. K.S. Sidhu

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Murari Kumar

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2014. % + RFA No.341/2013 THE REGISTRAR, INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Murari Kumar, Adv. Versus K.S. SIDHU Through:...