Advanced Search Results
Tmt. Saroja, Vs. General Insurance Corporation of India, Crop. Insuran ...
Chennai
Aug-07-2002
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 110A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 161(3)
2004ACJ645; (2002)3MLJ429
K.S. Narasimhan, Amicus Curie;P. Antony Xavier, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. For the death of one Williams Rajakumar in a road accident that took place on 01.01.1993, wife and his children have approached this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Express Transport Corporation, Tamil Nadu Division-ii, Represent ...
Chennai
Dec-19-2002
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173
2004ACJ1279
Ferozkhan, Adv. in C.M.A. Nos. 1884, 2117 to 2122/2000, 77 to 80, 129 to 132, 151 to 166, 211 to 213 and 657 to 660/2001 and ;K.S. Narasimhan, Adv. in CMA Nos. 292 to 296/2001;N.M. Muthurajan, Adv. in
P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since all the above Appeals arose from a common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (II Small Causes Court), Chennai, they are being disposed of by the following common judgment. The State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Tirunelveli Vs. Pandurangan (Dead ...
Chennai
Nov-04-1996
Motor Vehicles
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 110 and 153 - Order 22, Rules 4 and 11 - Order 41, Rule 3-A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14; Tamil Nadu Requisitioning of Motor Vehicles Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3, 7, 9 and 10; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168 and 173; Rajasthan High Court Rules - 132 and 134
1999ACJ327; AIR1997Mad195
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. These appeals have been preferred by Oriental Insurance Company Limited Tirunelvcli, against the common award parsed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Tuticorin in M.A. C.T.O. Ps. Nos. 202/89, 26/90 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bommakkal and ors.
Chennai
Feb-13-1998
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 103A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 157
2000ACJ1500; [1998]94CompCas819(Mad)
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. New India Insurance Company Limited has filed the above review application under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order made in C.M.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC. Karunanidhi Vs. M. Shanthi and Another
Chennai
Nov-26-2012
Motor Vehicles
For the Appellant: A.N. Viswanatha Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, K.S. Narasimhan, Advocate.
(PRAYER : Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.2880 of 1999 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (VI Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai.) This appeal by the injured in a road...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd., Salam Vs. Lakshmi and Others
Chennai
Jul-11-1989
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(1)
AIR1990Mad108
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the Insurance Company, with which the vehicle involved in the accident and against the driver of which vehicle the culpability of being rash and negligent has been found...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madras-2 Vs. R.K. Geetha and An ...
Chennai
Apr-06-1999
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Sections 2 , 11-1 and 95(2)
2000ACJ704; 1999(1)CTC752; (1999)IIMLJ695
Mr. K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
ORDER1. Aggrieved by the Award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madras, in M.A.C.T.O.P.No. 1641 of 1986, New India Assurance Company Limited, Madras-2, has filed the above appeal questioning its liability.2. First respondent herein/claimant therein filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lakshmi and Others
Chennai
Jul-11-1989
Company
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(1)
1990ACJ390
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
Nainar Sundaram, J. 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal by the insurance company, with which the vehicle involved in the accident had has been insured and against the driver of which vehicle the culpability of being rash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.R. Daniel and anr. Vs. T. Vaitheeswaran and ors.
Chennai
Sep-09-1987
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B
I(1989)ACC327; AIR1989Mad5
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
Swamikkannu, J.1. It is argued on behalf of the appellants herein that the sum of Rs. 10,000/- granted by the Tribunal as damages to the claimants for mental agony, pain and suffering in the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanapal Perinbam Roadways Vs. Indirani Ammal and ors.
Chennai
Jul-08-1996
Motor Vehicle
II(1996)ACC446; 1997ACJ766
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. The respondents owner of the vehicle and the insurance company, in M.C.O.P. No. 1045 of 1991 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirunelveli, are the appellants in the above appeal. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »