Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k s narasimhan · Page 1 of about 118 results (0.116 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 2002

Tmt. Saroja, Vs. General Insurance Corporation of India, Crop. Insuran ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2002

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 110A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 161(3)

Reported in : 2004ACJ645; (2002)3MLJ429

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Amicus Curie;P. Antony Xavier, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. For the death of one Williams Rajakumar in a road accident that took place on 01.01.1993, wife and his children have approached this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2002

State Express Transport Corporation, Tamil Nadu Division-ii, Represent ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173

Reported in : 2004ACJ1279

Advocate for Appellant : Ferozkhan, Adv. in C.M.A. Nos. 1884, 2117 to 2122/2000, 77 to 80, 129 to 132, 151 to 166, 211 to 213 and 657 to 660/2001 and ;K.S. Narasimhan, Adv. in CMA Nos. 292 to 296/2001;N.M. Muthurajan, Adv. in

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since all the above Appeals arose from a common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (II Small Causes Court), Chennai, they are being disposed of by the following common judgment. The State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1996

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Tirunelveli Vs. Pandurangan (Dead ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 110 and 153 - Order 22, Rules 4 and 11 - Order 41, Rule 3-A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14; Tamil Nadu Requisitioning of Motor Vehicles Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3, 7, 9 and 10; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168 and 173; Rajasthan High Court Rules - 132 and 134

Reported in : 1999ACJ327; AIR1997Mad195

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. These appeals have been preferred by Oriental Insurance Company Limited Tirunelvcli, against the common award parsed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Tuticorin in M.A. C.T.O. Ps. Nos. 202/89, 26/90 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 13 1998

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bommakkal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-1998

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 103A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 157

Reported in : 2000ACJ1500; [1998]94CompCas819(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. New India Insurance Company Limited has filed the above review application under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order made in C.M.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 2012

C. Karunanidhi Vs. M. Shanthi and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-26-2012

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: A.N. Viswanatha Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, K.S. Narasimhan, Advocate.

(PRAYER : Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.2880 of 1999 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (VI Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai.) This appeal by the injured in a road...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1989

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Salam Vs. Lakshmi and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-1989

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(1)

Reported in : AIR1990Mad108

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the Insurance Company, with which the vehicle involved in the accident and against the driver of which vehicle the culpability of being rash and negligent has been found...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1999

M/S. New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madras-2 Vs. R.K. Geetha and An ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Sections 2 , 11-1 and 95(2)

Reported in : 2000ACJ704; 1999(1)CTC752; (1999)IIMLJ695

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the Award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madras, in M.A.C.T.O.P.No. 1641 of 1986, New India Assurance Company Limited, Madras-2, has filed the above appeal questioning its liability.2. First respondent herein/claimant therein filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1989

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lakshmi and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-1989

Subject : Company

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(1)

Reported in : 1990ACJ390

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

Nainar Sundaram, J. 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal by the insurance company, with which the vehicle involved in the accident had has been insured and against the driver of which vehicle the culpability of being rash...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1987

J.R. Daniel and anr. Vs. T. Vaitheeswaran and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1987

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B

Reported in : I(1989)ACC327; AIR1989Mad5

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

Swamikkannu, J.1. It is argued on behalf of the appellants herein that the sum of Rs. 10,000/- granted by the Tribunal as damages to the claimants for mental agony, pain and suffering in the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1996

Dhanapal Perinbam Roadways Vs. Indirani Ammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-08-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicle

Reported in : II(1996)ACC446; 1997ACJ766

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The respondents owner of the vehicle and the insurance company, in M.C.O.P. No. 1045 of 1991 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirunelveli, are the appellants in the above appeal. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial