Advanced Search Results
Karumbayiram Pillai Annadhana Dharma Charities Nachiarkoil by Its Trus ...
Chennai
Sep-23-1953
Tenancy
Tenacny Law; Madras Tanjore Tenants and Pannaiyals Protection Act, 1952 - Sections 2
AIR1954Mad805; (1954)IMLJ277
K.S. Desikan, Adv.
ORDERGovinda Menon, J.1. The petitioner is Sri Karumbaylram Pillai Annadhana Dharma Charities, Nachiarkoil, by its trustees and the petition is for issuing a writ of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the order dated 7-2-1953...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalvannam Pillai (Since Deceased) and ors. Vs. Ganpathy Ayyar Alias Sa ...
Chennai
Feb-01-1952
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 91
AIR1954Mad179; (1952)IMLJ552
K.S. Desikan, Adv.
Venkatarama Ayyar, J.1. This Second appeal raises a question of some novelty and importance about the rights of members of the public to take funeral procession through public streets and pathways. The plaintiffs are the appellants....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaju Pillai Vs. Palanisami Pillai and ors.
Chennai
Aug-01-1963
Trusts and Societies
Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 90 and 94; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 8; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(2) and 101 to 104
AIR1964Mad205
K.S. Desikan, ;K. Raman and ;V. Ratnam, Advs.
Anantanarayanan, J.1. This appeal has been instituted by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 123 of 1956 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli from the judgment of Kailasam, J., in App. 93 of 1958...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Varadarajulu Reddiar Vs. Venkatakrishna Reddiar and ors.
Chennai
Oct-11-1957
Civil
(1958)1MLJ199
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is a petition by one Varadarajulu Reddiar, the plaintiff in O.S. No. 78 of 1955 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, for revising and setting aside the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.S. Munirathanam, Since Deceased by Lrs. Vs. P. Sundaram, Since Decea ...
Karnataka
Jan-08-2004
Contract
AIR2004Kant383; ILR2004KAR2328
V.K. Bhat, Adv. for ;Kumar and Kumar
K. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. The appeal filed against the judgment and decree passed in RA No. 15/88 on the file of Civil Judge, K.G.F. arising out of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 391/76 on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Ismail Maracair and ors. Vs. Doraisami Mudaliar and ors.
Chennai
Apr-23-1958
LimitationCivil
(1959)2MLJ74
Mr. K. S. Desikan
P.V. Ramachandra Iyer, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Chandra Reddi, J., in Appeal No. 13 of 1950, reversing the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, in O.S. No. 19...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.S.K.L. Kulandayan Chettiar Vs. Ar, Rm. Omayal Achi and anr.
Chennai
Apr-03-1961
Civil
Indian Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 89
AIR1962Mad171; (1961)2MLJ282
(1) This second appeal arises out of a suit by a principal against his agent for rendition of accounts. The defendant is the appellant, against whom a preliminary decree for rendition of accounts has been passed.(2)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.R. Srinivasaraghavan Vs. Padmavathi Ammal (Died) and ors.
Chennai
Dec-04-1958
PropertyCivil
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88
AIR1959Mad468
G.R. Jagadesan, Adv.
Ramachandra Iyer, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Rumba-konam in O. S. No. 3 of 1954. Defendant 1 is the appellant. The suit was laid for recovery of possession....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.K. Santhanagopala Chettiar and ors. Vs. Thimmi M. Seetharama Chettia ...
Chennai
Jan-29-1968
Trusts and Societies
(1968)2MLJ41
Ismail, J.1. Respondents 1 and 2 herein instituted O.S. No. 359 of 1965 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Kumbakonam, for ' (a) declaring that Sri Rajagopalaswami Temple set out in Schedule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVeeramalai Chettiar and ors. Vs. Ramayee Ammal
Chennai
Dec-11-1961
FamilyProperty
AIR1962Mad437
Mr. K. S. Ramamurthi
(1) The plaintiffs are the appellants. They filed a suit for partition by metes and bounds and separate possession of the plaintiffs' two-third share in one half of the suit property and for recovery of past...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »