Advanced Search Results
In Re: Shantabai Rani Benoor
Mumbai
Nov-28-1950
Criminal
Bombay Prevention of Prostitution Act, 1923 - Sections 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13 and 19
AIR1951Bom337; (1951)53BOMLR142; ILR1951Bom621
K.S. Daundkar, ;G.N. Vaidya and ;M.A. Rane, Advs.;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader
Chagla, C.J.1. By this petn. an order made under Section 9(1), Bombay Prevention of Prostitution Act, 1923, by the Addl. Dist. Mag. of Poona, is being challenged. The order served upon the petnr. stated that whereas...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadu Laxman and anr. Vs. Hanamati Sakharam and anr.
Mumbai
Oct-04-1955
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Hindu Law; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 43, 105 and 111; Khoti Abolition Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12
AIR1956Bom624
K.S. Daundkar and ;M.M. Virkar, Advs.
1. The third plaintiff Chandulal Chunilal who was a member of a joint Hindu family consisting of himself and his father sold S. Nos. 115, 35/1A and 85/2 of the village of Borwali, Taluka Mangaon, to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Jayantilal Govinddas
Mumbai
Mar-11-1952
Criminal
Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 - Sections 5, 7 and 12
AIR1953Bom82; (1952)54BOMLR790; ILR1953Bom91
K.S. Daundkar, Asst. Govt. Pleader
Vyas, J.(1) This is an appeal by the State of Bombay against an order of acquittal passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, in favour of the original accused persons Jayantilal Govinddas and Chimanlal Vrijlal who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shivappa Satawappa Vs. Gajanan Chintaman and anr.
Mumbai
Mar-31-1953
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8), 2(18), 70, 85 and 85(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 20, Rule 12
AIR1954Bom107; (1953)55BOMLR843
S.B. Bhasme, Adv. for K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Shah, J.1. The plaintiff filed Suit No. 408 of 1949 in the Court of the Civil Judge (junior Division) at Shahapur against the two defendants for a decree for possession of certain lands from the defendants,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bhaurao Karbhari Aware
Mumbai
Sep-27-1949
Criminal
Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1)
AIR1950Bom126
H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader;H.A. Rane, Adv. for ;K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Weston, J.1. This is an application made by one Bhaurao Karbhari Aware for exercise of our powers under Section 491, Criminal P. C in relation to one Dagdu Vithal Zolekar, uncle of the applicant, who is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandu Khandu Vs. Narayan Krishna
Mumbai
Oct-03-1955
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 3A
AIR1956Bom162
M.A. Rane, Adv. for ;K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
1. The defendant was a tenant in the year 1943 of Section Nos. 2 and 234/1. The plaintiff purchased the lands in 1944 from the owner thereof and thereafter served a notice upon the defendant terminating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangrao Dnyanu Nikam Vs. State
Mumbai
Jun-26-1951
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5
AIR1952Bom72; (1951)53BOMLR834; ILR1952Bom201
K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Chainani, J.[1] This is an appeal by the accused against his conviction under Section 19 (f), Arms Act and under Section 5, Explosive Substances Act, and the sentences passed upon him by the Sessions Judge, South...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Raghu Patil and ors. Vs. State
Mumbai
Oct-12-1955
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 148, 149, 302 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162 and 367
AIR1956Bom183; 1956CriLJ389
S.B. Bhasme, Adv. for ;K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Gajendragadkar, J. 1. The five appellants have been convicted under Section 148, I. P. Code, Section 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C., and under Section 324 read with Section 149, I. P. C. Of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalu Govinda and ors. Vs. Narayan Gyanuji and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-01-1955
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 20(1), 20(2), 70 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9
AIR1956Bom208
Gole, Adv. for ;K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
1. This is an appeal by defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and by the heir of defendant No. 5 and it arises out of a judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant Judge, North...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxmibai Wamanrao Vs. Wamanrao Govindrao
Mumbai
Sep-26-1952
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7; Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(4) and 2(7); Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act, 1895 - Sections 4
AIR1953Bom342; (1953)55BOMLR357; ILR1953Bom1031
S.B. Bhasme, Adv. for ;K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Rajadhyaksha, J. (1) This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant future maintenance at the rate of Rs. 100 per month and arrears of maintenance at the same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »