Advanced Search Results
Kashi Prasad Dwivedi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-22-2004
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 300A
2004(4)AWC3072
R.N. Singh and ; V.K.S. Chandel, Advs.
ORDERM. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation for the petitioners land, or in the alternative to restore back possession of the said land which has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirtiwas and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Mar-25-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 376, 376(2), 342 and 506B
2006CriLJ2829
Prafulla Bharat, Adv.
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. In Sessions case No. 458/2000 Shri C. B. Bajipai, learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bastar place Jagdalpur vide judgment dated 13-10-2001 convicted the appellants Vijay and Bhuvneshwar under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(g)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKartik Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Mar-09-2006
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 50 and 55
2006CriLJ2293
Sangita Mishra, Adv.
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13-2-2004 delivered in Special Case No. 46/2003 by Shri R. S. Sharma, learned Sessions Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Bastar, Headquarter at Jagdalpur whereby the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amru S/O. Shivcharan Gond Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Sep-14-2007
Criminal
2008CriLJ284
Shri. R.P. Tripathi, Shri. Tripathi
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. By this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr. P.C. the accused/appellant has questioned legality and correctness of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20th November, 2001, passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirtanram Mansai Uranv Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Chhattisgarh
Jul-28-2011
Criminal
Shri. R.K. Jain
Radhe Shyam Sharma, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23-12-1994 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, District Surguja in Sessions Trial No.111/92. By the impugned judgment, appellant Kirtanram has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTiharu and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Mar-09-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376(2)
2006CriLJ2358
Parag Kotecha, Adv.
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10-5-2002, delivered by Shri Yogesh Mathur, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Bilaspur in Session Case No. 356 of 2001, where by the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Sep-17-2007
Criminal
2008(2)MPHT28(CG)
Shri. Vijay Deshmukh
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Challenge is made to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13-12-2001 passed in S.T. No. 5/2001 by the IIIrd Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.C.) Raigarh, whereby, the said Court, after...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaradhuram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Dec-04-2009
Criminal
2010CriLJ1188
Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia
T.P. Sharma, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction & order of sentence dated 15.2.2002 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Kanker, in Sessions Trial No. 198/2000 whereby & whereunder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShardadeen Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-05-2005
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act - Sections 33 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules; Constitution of India - Article 21
2005(1)AWC919
R.N. Singh and ;V.K.S. Chandel, Advs.
S.U. Khan, J.1. This writ petition is directed against orders dated 15.3.2004 and 10.12.2004. First order has been passed by Deputy Collector, Handia, district Allahabad in Case No. 107 under Section 33/39 Land Revenue Act Durvijay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFaujdar Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-31-2002
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 48
2002(2)AWC1012
Ram Niwas Singh and ;V.K.S. Chandel, Advs.
Ashok Bhushan, J.1. One of the questions which has arisen in the writ petition is as to whether the Deputy Director of Consolidation while exercising jurisdiction under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »