Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k ravi · Page 1 of about 835 results (0.183 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, and anr. Vs. M/S.Mohan Breweries a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : r.K.Ravi Ananthapadmanabhan, Adv.

1. Substantial question of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is "whether the second respondent was correct in law in allowing the MODVAT benefits when the sub-heading 8429.00 is one of the specifically excluded...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 1996

Annamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricit ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-02-1996

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 49, 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21 and 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39, 40 to 47, 44, 48 and 39 to 47; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 74; Indian Electricity (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1980 - Sections 39(1) and 44(1)

Reported in : AIR1996Mad364

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition coming on for hearing on Wednesday, the 6th, Thursday, the 7th and Friday, the 9th day of December, 1995 upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2001

Dr. Devendra Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, Ripon Buildi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2001

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 79 and 256 (3); M.C.M.C. Act - Sections 256 (1), (2) and (3)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4823; (2001)2MLJ10

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Subramanian, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Ravi Anatha Padmanbhan, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This Contempt Application has been filed for punishing the respondents for non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 3.8.2000 in W.A. No.1171 of 2000, despite the receipt of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 1998

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Ezhumeswaramudayar Temple

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 10(1), 11, 12, 12A and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 246, 366, 366(1) and 368; Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : [2001]247ITR521(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Adv.

Janarthanam, J.1. This tax case (revision) is directed against the order dated October 28, 1993, of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (for short 'the Tribunal'), and made in A.T.A. No. 84 of 1991,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1998

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Tvl. Goodwill Estate

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-07-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : [1999]237ITR558(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Special Government Pleader

Janarthanam, J.1. This revision is directed against the order, dated September 21, 1993, of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (for short 'the Tribunal'), and made in A. T. A. No. 36 of 1993...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1998

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Krishna Oil Mills

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-06-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 12(3)

Reported in : [2003]133STC347(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Special Government Pleader (T)

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. This Tax Case (Revision) is directed against the order dated March 27, 1992 of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (Main Bench) (for short 'Tribunal') and made in T.A. No. 851 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2010

Super Spinning Mills Limited. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.K.Ravi, Adv.

1. The petitioner is a private limited company carrying on business of manufacturing of textile cotton yarn. The second respondent passed the assessment order on 29.03.2000 for the assessment year 1997-1998 under Section 143(3) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise Pondicherry Commissionerate. Vs.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-2010

Subject : Central Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, Adv.

1. Though notice was duly served on the respondents, there is no representation either in person or through counsel. We therefore, proceed to decide this appeal on merits.2. In this appeal, the question of law that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1999

Annamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1999

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1999Mad420

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi, Adv.

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent-Board to treat the sanctioned maximum load of the petitioner's Mill as 1350 K.V.A. with effect from 1-7-1995, and refund to the petitioner whatever...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1996

M.M.T.C. Limited, Rep. by Its Senior Manager Vs. S. Mohammed Gani, Pro ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-17-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 239; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC232

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi, Adv.

ORDERN. Arumugam, J.1. In ordering notice of motion of the present revision case filed by the complainant/petitioner who lost the case before the trial court viz., VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Madras in Crl.MP.No.1910 of 1995...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial