Advanced Search Results
The Commissioner of Central Excise, and anr. Vs. M/S.Mohan Breweries a ...
Chennai
Aug-20-2010
Land Acquisition
r.K.Ravi Ananthapadmanabhan, Adv.
1. Substantial question of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is "whether the second respondent was correct in law in allowing the MODVAT benefits when the sub-heading 8429.00 is one of the specifically excluded...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnnamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricit ...
Chennai
Jan-02-1996
Electricity
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 49, 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21 and 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39, 40 to 47, 44, 48 and 39 to 47; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 74; Indian Electricity (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1980 - Sections 39(1) and 44(1)
AIR1996Mad364
K. Ravi, Adv.
ORDER1. This writ petition coming on for hearing on Wednesday, the 6th, Thursday, the 7th and Friday, the 9th day of December, 1995 upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Devendra Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, Ripon Buildi ...
Chennai
Mar-02-2001
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 79 and 256 (3); M.C.M.C. Act - Sections 256 (1), (2) and (3)
2001CriLJ4823; (2001)2MLJ10
Mr. G. Subramanian, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Ravi Anatha Padmanbhan, Adv.
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This Contempt Application has been filed for punishing the respondents for non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 3.8.2000 in W.A. No.1171 of 2000, despite the receipt of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Ezhumeswaramudayar Temple
Chennai
Jan-09-1998
Direct Taxation
Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 10(1), 11, 12, 12A and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 246, 366, 366(1) and 368; Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1973
[2001]247ITR521(Mad)
K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Adv.
Janarthanam, J.1. This tax case (revision) is directed against the order dated October 28, 1993, of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (for short 'the Tribunal'), and made in A.T.A. No. 84 of 1991,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu Vs. Tvl. Goodwill Estate
Chennai
Jan-07-1998
Direct Taxation
Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1991
[1999]237ITR558(Mad)
K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Special Government Pleader
Janarthanam, J.1. This revision is directed against the order, dated September 21, 1993, of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (for short 'the Tribunal'), and made in A. T. A. No. 36 of 1993...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu Vs. Krishna Oil Mills
Chennai
Feb-06-1998
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 12(3)
[2003]133STC347(Mad)
K. Ravi Raja Pandian, Special Government Pleader (T)
ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. This Tax Case (Revision) is directed against the order dated March 27, 1992 of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104 (Main Bench) (for short 'Tribunal') and made in T.A. No. 851 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuper Spinning Mills Limited. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and anr.
Chennai
Aug-20-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mr.K.Ravi, Adv.
1. The petitioner is a private limited company carrying on business of manufacturing of textile cotton yarn. The second respondent passed the assessment order on 29.03.2000 for the assessment year 1997-1998 under Section 143(3) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central Excise Pondicherry Commissionerate. Vs.
Chennai
Jul-02-2010
Central Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35
Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, Adv.
1. Though notice was duly served on the respondents, there is no representation either in person or through counsel. We therefore, proceed to decide this appeal on merits.2. In this appeal, the question of law that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnnamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Chennai
Mar-11-1999
Electricity
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49
AIR1999Mad420
K. Ravi, Adv.
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent-Board to treat the sanctioned maximum load of the petitioner's Mill as 1350 K.V.A. with effect from 1-7-1995, and refund to the petitioner whatever...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M.T.C. Limited, Rep. by Its Senior Manager Vs. S. Mohammed Gani, Pro ...
Chennai
Jun-17-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 239; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
1996(2)CTC232
K. Ravi, Adv.
ORDERN. Arumugam, J.1. In ordering notice of motion of the present revision case filed by the complainant/petitioner who lost the case before the trial court viz., VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Madras in Crl.MP.No.1910 of 1995...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »