Advanced Search Results
Smt. Palchuri Hanumayamma Vs. Tadikamalla Kotlingam (D) by L.Rs. and o ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-09-2001
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1955 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 19; Indian Succession Act - Sections 119; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 11 and 14
AIR2001SC3062; JT2001(8)SC449; (2002)1MLJ97(SC); RLW2002(2)SC272; 2001(7)SCALE100; (2001)8SCC552
K.R. Nagaraja,; S.K. Agnihotri,; S.B. Bhat, Advs. (NP),;
Santosh Hegde, J. 1. This appeal has had a chequered career. Still it may not be necessary for us to trace the entire history of this litigation. Suffice, it to say that the appellant herein filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-22-2004
Service
2004(6)ALD66(SC); 2004(4)AWC3224(SC); 2004(4)CTC789; JT2004(7)SC576; (2005)ILLJ6SC; (2004)4MLJ159(SC); 2004(8)SCALE116; (2005)9SCC748; 2005(1)SLJ390(SC)
K.R. Nagaraja, Adv
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal was filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.07.2003 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No. 10285/CAT/2003 wherein...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Kempaiah
Karnataka
Jul-27-1998
Criminal
Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(8), 7, 7(2), 8, 9 to 11, 12 and 14; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Karnataka Lokayukta Rules, 1985 - Rules 2 and 4
1998CriLJ4070
K.R. Nagaraja and ;K.K. Tyagi, Advs.
S.S. Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. In these appeals, filed by the State of Karnataka against the common judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 2nd July, 1996 in Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Ashrafulla Khan and ors ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-14-2002
ConstitutionMotor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Repealed Act - Sections 57(2), 68-C,68D, 68D(1), 68D(2), 68D(3), 68F, 68F(2), 68FF; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19(6) and 226
AIR2002SC629; [2002(1)JCR497(SC)]; JT2002(2)SC113; RLW2002(2)SC210; 2002(1)SCALE138; (2002)2SCC560; [2002]1SCR194
G.L. Sanghi, Sr. Adv.,; K.R. Nagaraja,; N.D.B. Raju,;
In this group of appeals, the question that falls for our consideration is "whether small portion or portions falling within the limits of towns or villages on a notified route under Chapter IVA of Motor Vehicles...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Tiwari (D) by Lrs. Vs. Jagat NaraIn Rai and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-2001
Service
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16F; ;Registration of Co-operative Societies Act; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963
AIR2002SC211,2002(1)AWC8(SC),JT2001(9)SC584,2002LabIC124,2001(8)SCALE216,(2001)10SCC11,(2002)1UPLBEC6
R.S. Hegde, Adv. for K.R. Nagaraja, Adv. (NP
Raju, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 14.2.1995 in Special Appeal No.88 of 1995, affirming the decision of a learned Single Judge of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Govind Hegde Vs. Kamalakara Shivarama Hegde and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-2001
CivilProperty
Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 31, 32 and 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 9, Rule 9; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2) and (3)
2001IXAD(SC)46; AIR2001SC3861; JT2001(9)SC30; 2001(7)SCALE242; (2001)8SCC487
S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv. and; P.R. Ramasesh, Adv
Punkan, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the appellant has assailed the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court in Civil Revision Petition No. 1992 of 1977. The parties herein shall be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Dilip K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-29-1999
Criminal
1999(1)SCALE465
ORDER1. We have perused the compliance affidavits and the comparative chart prepared by the learned Amicus:State of Tamil Nadu2. It appears that all the directions issued in D.K. Basu's case are being complied with.State of Gujarat3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Gangarasniah Vs. A. Narayanaswamy and Otherswiths. Ramamurthy Ect. ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-17-1993
ServiceLabour and Industrial
Recruitment Rules
AIR1994SC838; 1994LabIC674; (1994)ILLJ1026SC; 1994Supp(2)SCC669
1. The question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether the seniority of the respondent direct recruit employees is to be determined with reference to the date of their appointment or from the date...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. R. Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-1987
Service
Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1930 - Rule 20
AIR1988SC292; 1988LabIC379; 1987Supp(1)SCC33
Shri. K. R. Nagaraja
ORDER1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties at length on the question of constitutionality of Rule 20, Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules 1930 as applicable to the members of the Haryana Civil Service...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShish Ram and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-19-1996
Service
Constitution of India - Article 309
1996VIAD(SC)330; [1996(74)FLR2346]; JT1996(7)SC353; 1996(5)SCALE785; (1996)10SCC166; [1996]Supp3SCR771; 1996(3)SLJ97(SC); 1996(2)LC561(SC); (1997)1UPLBEC379
H.S. Gururaja,; Devendra Singh and; Deeva Singh, Advs
ORDER1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides and also respondent No. 8 in person.3. The undisputed facts are that while the appellants were working as Head Clerks and respondent Nos. 3 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »