Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k r d karanth · Page 1 of about 74 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 05 1990

Dr. S.C. Patil Vs. Karnataka University

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-05-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 20 and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3638; 1990(3)KarLJ108

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

ORDERMohan, C.J.1. All these Writ Petitions can be dealt with under common Judgment since the relief that is prayed for, is one and the same,2. The petitioners in W.Ps. Nos. 18167, 18168 and 18169 of 1985,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1991

Bangalore Timber Corporation Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-20-1991

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1) and 21(1)(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4013

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

ORDERKedambady Jagannatha Shetty, J. 1. The Petitioners have filed these two Writ Petitions for an order declaring Section 21(1)(l) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ACT') as ultravires of Article...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1966

V.K. Kangan and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore Represented by the Chief ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-06-1966

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 9 and 17; Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1967Kant133; AIR1967Mys133; (1966)2MysLJ739

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth and ;P.V. Aithal, Advs.

Somnath Iyer, J.1. In this Writ Petition thirteen persons whose lands were proposed to be acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act call in question the acquisition proceedings which commenced with a preliminary notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 21 1992

Leena Fernandes Vs. Planning Authority

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 76, 76K and 76K(1)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3068; 1992(3)KarLJ355

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J. 1. In these Petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of the building licence and the sanctioned plan issued to the fourth respondent by the first respondent - Planning Authority and the second respondent -City...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1972

M.V. Shivaji Rao Kore and ors. Vs. Rukminiyamma and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-24-1972

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1973Kant113; AIR1973Mys113

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

1. This appeal arises out of the decree passed in O. S. No. 35 of 1964 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge. Mysore.The facts of the case are these: One D. Venketarao Kore (Defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1986

T. Prakash Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-01-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise (Lease of the Right of Retail Vend of Liquors), Rules, 1969 - Rule 7 and 7(2)

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1673; 1986(2)KarLJ165

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

ORDERDoddakale Gowda, J.1. Petitioner in first case has challenged the validity of auction proceedings, dated 2-5-1986, of Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Bangalore, disposing of right of retail vend of toddy in Bangalore District and provisional acceptance of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1985

Shiva Rao Vs. Cecilia Pereira

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-04-1985

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2304; 1987(1)KarLJ182

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

ORDERVenkatachala, J.1. The short question, which arises for decision in this Revision Petition, is whether the prohibition under sub-section (1) of Section 21 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1981

Sudershan Boury and anr. Vs. Director of Enforcement, New Delhi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-1981

Subject : Company

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 4(1), 9, 13, 18(1), 19(1), 50, 52(3), 52(4) and 54

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas103(Kar); 1982(1)KarLJ62

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

Sabhahit, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common order, dated October 18,1978, passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, in Appeal Nos. 1464/1977 and 142/1978, on its file, reducing the penalty against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1981

Sudershan Boury and Etc. Vs. the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-1981

Subject : Fera

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 50 and 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1) and 9

Reported in : AIR1982Kant135; [1982]52CompCas305a(Kar); ILR1982KAR280

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

Sabhahit, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common order dated 18-10-78, passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, in appeal Nos. 1464/1977 and 142/1978, on its file, reducing the penalty against the husband...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1971

Hanamangouda Venkanagouda Vs. Hanamanagouda and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-29-1971

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Mysore High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 6; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 39; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1972Kant286; AIR1972Mys286

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.

Chandrasekhar, J.1. This Second Appeal has come up before us on a reference made under the proviso to Section 6 of the Mysore High Court Act. 1961. 2. The principal question that arises in this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial