Advanced Search Results

Megha Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 50, 52 and 57

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3091

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Chaudhary, Adv.

M.A.A. Khan, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment and order dated 25-7-1992 whereby the learned Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer held the EO/GO/R158/97/MPP/USA petitioner guilty of the offence under Section. 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and...

Dharamveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR994]; (2001)IILLJ1168Raj; 2001(4)WLC113; 2001(2)WLN59

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERShethna, J.(1). Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Vimal Mathur was asked to appear in the matter as earlier he appeared for the respondents on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.(2). At...

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Panetrical Engg. Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Shop and Establishment Act; Central Excise Act - Sections 11AC; Central Excise Rules - Rules 173Q and 209A

Reported in : 2006(204)ELT397(Bom); 2006[4]STR422

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Chaudhari, Adv., i/b., T.C. Kaushik, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. K.R. Chaudhari, the learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. M.H. Patil, the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. The Tribunal considered the entire material and then in paragraph 2.1 recorded the finding concerning...

Cit Vs. Shatrunjay Diamonds

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]128TAXMAN759(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetley, K.R. Chaudhari and K.B. Rao, for the Revenue S.J. Mehta and Ms. A. Vissanjee, for the Assessee

J.P. Devadhar, J.The revenue has filed this tax appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred...

Shankerbhai Ganeshbhai Chaudhary Vs. Principal and Others

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

Oral, J. 1. The petitioner has moved this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction to the respondents to treat the service of the petitioner to be continued srevice and to pay...

Jimmy Jahangir Madan Vs. Bolly Cariyappa Hindley (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 205, 273 and 302; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 495; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2005SC48; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)305; I(2005)BC16; [2005]126CompCas385(SC); 2005CriLJ112; 2004(5)CTC420; 2005(1)KarLJ492; 2004(3)KLT850(SC); (2005)141PLR209; RLW2005(2)SC185; 20

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta,; Shalini Gupta and; Mohit Chaudhry, Advs. f

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. These appeals by special leave have been filed against judgment rendered by Karnataka High Court in revision applications upholding order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in two complaint cases whereby...

Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar Vs. Com ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and 11AC; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q, 173Q(1) and 209A

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR515; [2006]131CompCas690(Bom); 2008(223)ELT382(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sreedharan and Bharat Raichandani, Advs., i/b., PDS Legal, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Mr.V. Sreedharan, the counsel for the appellants and Mr.K.R. Chaudhari, the counsel for the revenue. 2. The following substantial questions of law arise in this appeal : 1) In view of...

Rohan Dyes and Intermediates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC, 80HHC(1) and 80HHC(3)

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(Bom)45; [2004]270ITR350(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Shah and ; J.R. Shah, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Shah, learned counsel for the appellant-assessee, and Mr. K.R. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue.2. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal by its order dated January 8, 2003, for the assessment year...

A.K. Mallu Vs. Puranachandra Rao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342

Reported in : AIR1967SC1363; 1967CriLJ1212; [1967]2SCR309

Hidayatullah, J. 1. These are two appeals, one (Criminal Appeal No. 243 of 1964) by one Purna Chandra Rao who has been convicted under section 342, Indian Penal Code by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh...

Dodsal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 1983(5)DRJ55

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit and; P.C. Gokhale, Advs

S. Ranganathan, J.1. This three appeals raise the same common issue and can be disposed of altogether. As it is common ground that the facts involved are the same and the disposal of one of the...