Advanced Search Results
S.P. Malhotra Vs. State (C.B.i.)
Punjab and Haryana
May-21-2014
Criminal
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Appeal No.S-1117-SB of 2002 ....Date of decision:21.5.2014 S.P.Malhotra ...Appellant v. State (C.B.I.) ...Respondent ...Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh ....Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Paras...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. AmIn and anr. Vs. Md. YasIn @ Yasim Mian and ors.
Jharkhand
Mar-16-2004
FamilyProperty
Mohammedan Law
[2004(3)JCR255(Jhr)]
P.K. Parsad, Adv.
ORDERVishnudeo Narayan, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal has been preferred at the instance of defendants-appellants against: the impugned order dated 5.3.2003 by Sub-Judge VIII in Title Partition Suit No. 41 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarlok Chand and ors. Vs. National Industrial Development Corporation ...
Delhi
Jul-07-1994
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 226
1994IIIAD(Delhi)604; 55(1994)DLT157; 1994(30)DRJ206; (1994)IILLJ1130Del
K. Parsad,; S. Mukherjee and; S.N. Bhandari, Advs
J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This is writ petition filed by petitioners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India alleging that they have been working as daily-rated workers under the respondent Corporation on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hans Raj and anr. Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-29-2006
Criminal
Delhi High Court Rules - Rule 4; Delhi High Court Orders; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 498A and 506
2006CriLJ2540; 129(2006)DLT118; I(2006)DMC650NULL; 2006(88)DRJ618
K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. and; K.K. Singh, Adv
Manju Goel, J.1. The appeal is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge (in short `ASJ') dated 24.11.1992 whereby he convicted the appellant No.1, Hans Raj, under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDate of Decision:19.5.2014 Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and Oth ...
Punjab and Haryana
May-19-2014
Education
CWP No.568 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.568 of 2013(O&M) Date of decision:19.5.2014 Jagdish Mitter ….Petitioner VERSUS Central Administrative Tribunal and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›