Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k parsad · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 2014

S.P. Malhotra Vs. State (C.B.i.)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2014

Subject : Criminal

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Appeal No.S-1117-SB of 2002 ....Date of decision:21.5.2014 S.P.Malhotra ...Appellant v. State (C.B.I.) ...Respondent ...Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh ....Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Paras...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2004

Md. AmIn and anr. Vs. Md. YasIn @ Yasim Mian and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-16-2004

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Mohammedan Law

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR255(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Parsad, Adv.

ORDERVishnudeo Narayan, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal has been preferred at the instance of defendants-appellants against: the impugned order dated 5.3.2003 by Sub-Judge VIII in Title Partition Suit No. 41 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1994

Tarlok Chand and ors. Vs. National Industrial Development Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)604; 55(1994)DLT157; 1994(30)DRJ206; (1994)IILLJ1130Del

Advocate for Appellant : K. Parsad,; S. Mukherjee and; S.N. Bhandari, Advs

J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This is writ petition filed by petitioners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India alleging that they have been working as daily-rated workers under the respondent Corporation on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2006

Hans Raj and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi High Court Rules - Rule 4; Delhi High Court Orders; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 498A and 506

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2540; 129(2006)DLT118; I(2006)DMC650NULL; 2006(88)DRJ618

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. and; K.K. Singh, Adv

Manju Goel, J.1. The appeal is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge (in short `ASJ') dated 24.11.1992 whereby he convicted the appellant No.1, Hans Raj, under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2014

Date of Decision:19.5.2014 Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and Oth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-19-2014

Subject : Education

CWP No.568 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.568 of 2013(O&M) Date of decision:19.5.2014 Jagdish Mitter ….Petitioner VERSUS Central Administrative Tribunal and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial