Advanced Search Results
Asstt. Cit Vs. Shyam Sunder Chhugani
Rajasthan
Nov-29-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)74TTJ(NULL)26
K.P. Meena, for the Revenue Shailendra Bardia, for the Assessee
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.As the above appeals are inter-related and involve common points so we are disposing them of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. ITA Nos. 2255/Jp/95, 727/Jp/96, 1113/Jp/94 and 230/Jp/95 are appeals...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal Balai Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Oct-15-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)73TTJ(NULL)876
Nauratan Mertia, for the Assessee K.P. Meena, for the Revenue
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.This appeal by assessee for assessment year 1990-91 is directed against the order of Deputy Commissioner (Appeal), Jodhpur, dated 15-11-1993.2. I have heard the arguments and also perused the records,3. Ground No. 1 disputes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.
Rajasthan
Oct-16-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)77TTJ(NULL)344
K.P. Meena, for the Revenue Dinesh Gupta & S. Krishna, for the Assessee
ORDERB.L. Khatri, A.M.This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Udaipur, dated 20-2-1994, for assessment year 1991-92. The appellant-revenue agitated on various grounds which are discussed as under :2. Ground No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
ito Vs. S.L. Choudhary
Rajasthan
Oct-25-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)73TTJ(NULL)699
K.P. Meena, for the Revenue Mahaveer Jain, for the Assessee
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.This appeal by revenue for assessment year 1991-92 is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Jodhpur, dated 10-1-1994.2. I have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the records.3. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Ram Chhugani Vs. Asstt. Cit
Rajasthan
Sep-13-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)77TTJ(NULL)339
Shailendra Baradia, for the Assessee K.P. Meena, for the Revenue
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.ITA Nos. 1267/Jp/94 and 1405/Jp/94 are two cross-appeals by assessee and revenue respectively for assessment year 1990-91 and are directed against the common order of Commissioner (Appeals), Jodhpur, dated 6-4-1994.2. I have heard the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.
Rajasthan
Oct-17-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)77TTJ(NULL)352
K.P. Meena, for the Revenue Dinesh Gupta & S. Krishna, for the Assessee
ORDERB.L. Khatri, A.M.This is an appeal by the revenue against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Udaipur, dated 28-11-1995, for assessment year 1992-93. The revenue-appellant has agitated on various grounds.2. Ground No. 1 : Deletion of disallowance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuwalal Giriraj Ajmera Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Jul-30-2002
Direct Taxation
(2004)86TTJ(NULL)414
R.P. Moondra & Ajay Moondra, for the Assessee K.P. Meena, for the Revenue
ORDERB.L. Khatri, A.M.ITA Nos. 96, 97 and 29/Ju/2001 are appeals by assessee Shri Suwalal Giriraj Ajmera against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Ajmer, for assessment yrs. 1994-95, 1996-97 and 1997-98. There are common grounds of appeal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChitra Devi Vs. Asstt. Cit
Rajasthan
Sep-17-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)77TTJ(NULL)640
U.C. Jain, for the Assessee K.P. Meena, for the Revenue
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.As the above appeals are inter-related and involve common points, so we are disposing them of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. ITSSA No. 7, 4 and 3/Jp/97 are appeals by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Rajasthan
Apr-24-2002
Direct Taxation
(2004)88TTJ(NULL)1045
ORDERB.L. Khatri, A.M.This appeal by the assessee is against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment year 1977-78. The appellant has agitated on various grounds which are being discussed and decided in this order.2. The appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Late Mangi Lal Through L/H Badri
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Jan-07-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(Jodh.)590
1. This appeal has been filed by the Department for asst. yr. 1988-89 and is directed against the order of CIT(A), Jodhpur dt. 26th Feb., 1993.2. There was a search operation and as a sequence of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »