Advanced Search Results
Binny Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-06-1984
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 49, 96V and 96W
1985(6)ECC71; 1985LC690(Karnataka); 1986(25)ELT154(Kar)
K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
ORDER1. M/s. Binny Limited, a public company incorporated under the Companies Act, which is the petitioner, is engaged in the manufacture of textile goods in one of its composite textile mills called 'Bangalore Woollen Cotton and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinny Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-29-1983
Excise
Indian Cotton Cess Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; State Laws Act; Produce Cess Act, 1966; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 6
1984(16)ELT52(Kar)
K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
1. As the parties and the questions that arise in these cases are common, I propose to dispose of them by a common order. 2. Prior to 15-8-1947 on which day the the Country attained independence,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinny Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise
Karnataka
Sep-29-1983
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226; Cotton Cess Act, 1923 - Sections 1, 1(2) and 2; Produce Cess Act, 1966 - Sections 12; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6
AIR1985Kant50
K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
ORDER1. As the parties and the questions that arise in these cases are common, I propose to dispose of them by a common order.2. Prior to 15-8-1947 on which day the Country attained independence, the then...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S. Padmanabhan Vs. Deputy Collector of Enforcement Directorate, Madras
Chennai
Sep-09-1986
Customs
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 9(1) and 54(1)
1990(27)ECC67; 1987(28)ELT344(Mad)
K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
Sathiadev, J.1. Appellant was proceeded against under Section 54(1)(aa) and (c) and 9(1)(b) and (d) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, by issuing for show cause notices dated 5.1.1977, and also proposing to confiscate Indian currencies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaster Recording Company Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.
Chennai
Apr-28-1992
Excise
1993(63)ELT60(Mad)
Shri N.S. Nandakumar for M/s. ;K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv. and ;N.S. Kasiviswanathan, Adv.
ORDER1. This Writ Petition coming on for hearing on Thursday the 23rd day of April 1992 and on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the order of the High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-11-1985
Land Acquisition
(1985)(21)ELT193Tri(Chennai)
1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Appellate Collector of Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs and Central Vs. Kasturi Paper, Foods and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-28-1985
Land Acquisition
(1985)(22)ELT510Tri(Chennai)
1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Collector of Central Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Palmer Foods (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-18-2001
MRTP
1. Upon examining the records and hearing both sides in the present application, we find that the appeal itself can be finally disposed of at this state. We, therefore, allow the application and proceed to deal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Apr-06-2004
Excise
(2004)(94)ECC356
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 118/01 Dated 24.10.2001 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the Order-in-Original and has held that duty of Rs. 3,14,199/- is rightly demandable from the party. It is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCc Vs. District Controller of Stores Icf
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-25-2005
MRTP
(2005)(100)ECC50
1. The issue involved in these two appeals filed by the Revenue relates to applicability of the exchange rate under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. Mrs. R. Bhagyadevi, learned SDR, submitted that the Respondent,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »