Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k p agarwal · Page 1 of about 135 results (0.154 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2003

Moti Lal Vs. Bharat Electronics Limited (Government of India, Enterpri ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 12 and 13A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(K) and 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)2UPLBEC1620

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Bushra Maryam, Advs.

S.P. Mehrotra, J. 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia praying for issuance of writ, order or direction commanding the respondents not to enforce their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2002

Mahabir Prasad Pathak Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-25-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2843; [2002(94)FLR1047]; (2002)3UPLBEC2315

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Mahima Maurya, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the award dated 31st July, 1985 passed by the Labour Court, Allahabad.2. Briefly, the admitted facts of this case are that the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1997

Ashok Kumar Misra Vs. L.H. Sugar Factory Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25K and 25N

Reported in : (1998)ILLJ32All

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal, Adv.

R.A. Sharma, J.1. Service of the appellant who was an employee of L.H. Sugar Factory, Pilibhit (hereinafter referred to as the Sugar Factory) was terminated by the management in 1993. Against the said order he filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 18 2003

Brij Lal Patel Vs. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-18-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules, 1975

Reported in : AIR2004All178

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Arvind Kumar, Advs.

ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. Writ Petition No. 28709 of 1993 Brij Lal Patel v. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and another was dismissed in default by an order dated 24-7-2003 which reads as below :'Sri Arvind Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1998

S.L. Bathla Vs. State of Bank of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-1998

Subject : ServiceBanking

Acts : Bank Staff Service Regulations - Regulations 521 and 522; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)1UPLBEC233

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sharma, ;Ravi Kiran Jain, ;Arvind Kumar and ;K.P. Agarwal, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. On 9th of September, 1981 the petitioner had applied for permission to contest the election to the Municipal Board, Saharanpur scheduled to be held in December, 1981. The permission was granted on 23rd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2002

Rajendra Prasad and ors. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 33C(2) and 36A

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC870

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Suman Sirohi, Advs.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order of the labour court dated 22.1.1980 in Misc. Case No. 141 of 1979 filed under Section 32C(2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2002

Ram Kishun Maurya and ors. Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-22-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC458

Advocate for Appellant : Suman Sirohi and ;K.P. Agarwal, Advs.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. The question is whether one set of court fee is payable when there is common cause for each of the petitioners and the question of law and facts involved in the writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1994

Baij Nath Bhattacharya Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-02-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 6N; Industrial Disputes (Central) Act - Sections 25B

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR14]; (1998)IIILLJ206All; (1994)3UPLBEC1842

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;A.K. Singh, Advs.

S.K. Keshote, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner--workman, employed with the respondent No.2 has raised an industrial dispute regarding alleged wrongful termination of his service w.e.f. August 31, 1981. The State of U.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1998

Balraj Singh and Others Vs. Sachiv/Mahaprabandhak, District Co-op. Ban ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-28-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC663

Advocate for Appellant : Shashi Kant Gupta and ;K.P. Agarwal, Advs.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri K. P. Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Sri R. P. Goel, learned Senior Advocate representing the respondents.2. For effective adjudication and resolution of controversy raised herein, it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2000

Workmen of Pepsico India Holdings Limited Vs. Deputy Labour Commission ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 32, 226 and 226(1)

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC1800; [2000(85)FLR778]; (2000)IILLJ523All; (2000)2UPLBEC1602

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Sinha and ;K.P. Agarwal, Advs.

M. Katju, J. 1. Heard Sri K. P. Agarwal learned counsel for petitioner.2. The petitioners are workmen of Pepsico India Holdings Limited which is a purely private company and is not State under Article 12 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial