Advanced Search Results

S. Ahmed Khan Vs. Turup Mohamed Hayat

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 42, 44, 69(1) and 69(2); Indian Contract Act - Sections 69 and 70

Reported in : AIR1953Kant4; AIR1953Mys4

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

1. The plaintiff brought a suit in the Court of the Munsif, Civil Station, for the recovery of Rs. 3,000/- from the defendant. His case was that he and the defendant agreed to run a taxi...

Ushodaya Enterprises Limited Vs. T.V. Venugopal and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 17, 44, 45, 50, 51, 55, 62 and 72; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 26 - Order 7, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 21, 27, 81, 105 and 106; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules, 1959; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALD723

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. N.A.K. Sharma, ;B. Nalinkumar, Advs.

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J 1. These two letters Patent Appeals arise out of a common judgment in CCCA Nos.178 and 180 of 2000 dated 28-12-2000 rendered by a learned single Judge of this Court.2. For the...

Pandurangan and anr. Vs. Dasu Reddy

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 65, 104 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 89, 90 and 92 - Order 34, Rule 5;

Reported in : AIR1973Mad107

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. N. Srinivasan

1. The auction purchaser is the first appellant. The decree holder is the second appellant. The judgment debtor, respondent herein, filed an application in E. A. 669 of 1969 under Order XXI. Rule 90 Civil P....

Mrs.Jayalakshmi Nayak, vs Valsa,

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2023/1ST JYAISHTA, 1945 RCREV. NO. 73 OF 2023 AGAINST...

T.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 26 - Order 7, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 17, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 45(1), 50, 51, 55, 62, 62(1), 72 and 72(2); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 4, 12(3), 27, 105 and 106; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 10(1), 11, 12, 12(1), 12(3), 18, 27(1), 34 and 46 - Schedule - Rules 12 and 26; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules; Specific Relief Act - Sections 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT42

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Sreenivasan, Sr. Adv. for ;Kalpana Ekbote, Adv. in CCCA No. 178/2000 and ;N.A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. for ;B. Nalinkumar, Adv. in CCCA No. 180/2000

G. Bikshapathy, J.1. Both the C.C.C. As. can be disposed of by a common judgment, as they arise out of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 555 of 1999 on the file of the...

Bal Pharma Ltd. Vs. Centaur Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28, 29 and 33(1)

Reported in : 2002(24)PTC226(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Srinivasan and ;Viraj Tulzapurkar, Advs., i/b., H.W. Kane, Adv.

ORDERP.C. 1. Appeal admitted. Notice made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service through counsel.2. By consent, appeal called out and heard. 3. This appeal, is directed against an ad-interim order granted by the learned Single Judge retraining...

Narasimha Setty Vs. Chennamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1950Kant8; AIR1950Mys8

Advocate for Appellant : Narasimhaiah, Adv. for ;K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

Balakrishnaiya, J. 1. The appellant is the petitioner who filed Misc. case No. 51 of 47-48 in the Court of the Munsiff, Bangalore, under the Mysore Guardian and Wards Act for the appointment of himself as...

In Re: Rangiah

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417, 423, 423(1), 423(2), 439, 439(1) and 439(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 304(2), 323 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1954Kant122; AIR1954Mys122

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

1. The appellant-accused was tried by the Sessions Judge, Bangalore Division, for an offence under Section 302, I. P. C. but was convicted under Section 323, I. P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one...

K. Kariappa Vs. Government of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Sales Tax Act - Sections 6, 14 to 16, 20 and 22; Income-tax Act, 1918 - Sections 52; Income-tax Act, 1886 - Sections 39; Indian Income-tax Act - Sections 67; Madras General Sales Tax Act - Sections 16

Reported in : [1953]4STC94(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Syed Nazir Ahmed, Adv. for K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner in these two revision petitions is a dealer in fried-gram knows as 'Hurigadale' as has been mentioned in the charge-sheet itself. He has been convicted in C.C. Nos. 537 and 538 of 1951-52...

Ravi and Etc. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and Other

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1486

Advocate for Appellant : V. Achuthan, Adv. and;P. Venkatasubramaniam, Adv. for;M/s. K.N. Srinivasan and;A.C. Jayalakshmi

Venkataswami, J.1. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners who have been detained under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as bootleggers, have challanged their detentions, and they pray for quashing the orders of detention and...