Advanced Search Results

Fattechand Rajmal JaIn Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)57TTJ(Pune.)341

These two appeals from the different assessees for the asst. yr.1987-88 are combined for the sake of convenience.2. The assessees have filed these appeals against the order under s.263 of the IT Act, 1961. The assessees...

Goyal Iron and Steel Works (India) Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. All the three appeals have been directed by the assessee against the order under Section 263 of the Act passed by CIT pertaining to block period 1st April, 1986, to 18th March, 1997.2. Briefly the...

Goyal Iron and Steel Works (India) Vs. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)76TTJAgra578

All the three appeals have been directed by the assessee against the order under section 263 of the Act passed by Commissioner pertaining to block period 1-4-1986 to 18-3-1997.Briefly the facts of the case are that...

Munshi Singh Gautam (D) and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 20(3), 21 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 304, 313, 330 and 331; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2006ACJ1002; AIR2005SC402; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)46; 2005CriLJ320; JT2004(10)SC547; 2004(3)KLT971(SC); RLW2005(2)SC209; 2004(9)SCALE390; (2005)9SCC631

Advocate for Appellant : Uday U. Lalit, Sr. Adv; Y.P. Singh,; Chatanya Siddharth,

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. 'If you once forfeit the confidence of our fellow citizens you can never regain their respect and esteem. It is true that you can fool all the people some of the time, and...

Food Corporation of India, Bhopal and ors. Vs. Babulal Agarwal, Bhopal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 21; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : AIR1998MP23

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Saxena, Adv.

S.K. Dubey, J. 1. This is a defendants' appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree dated 7-10-1994 passed in Civil. Suit No. 26-B/91, by the District Judge, Bhopal....

Moolchand Agrawal and Etc. Vs. Babulal Agrawal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : AIR2006MP42; 2005(3)MPLJ217

Advocate for Appellant : L.S. Baghel, ;P.R. Bhave, Sr. Advs. and ;D.S. Baghel and ;Jaideep Singh, Advs. ;

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. These three appeals have been preferred by three different defendants assailing the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court decreeing the suit of plaintiffs.2. A suit for declaration and injunction has been...

K.N. Agarwala Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 13, 14, 31, 31(2), 32(2) and 226; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1961 - Sections 6, 6(6), 6(7), 6(18), 7, 24 and 25

Reported in : AIR1965All175

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Khare and ;K.N. Singh, Advs.

Oak, J.1. In these two connected petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners have raised the question of validity of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (U. P. Act...

Agrawal and Company and ors. Vs. Maya Rani @ Malti Bai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

1 FA No. 430/1995 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Hon’ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No. 430/1995 .....APPELLANTS/ 1. Agrawal and Company a registered PLAINTIFFS Partnership Firm, 752, Lordganj, Jabalpur 2. Raja...

National Insurance Com.Ltd. Vs. Halki Bai and ors

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ; JABALPUR M.A No.2148/2003 National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Halkai and three others For the Appellant : Shri D.N.Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 &2 : Shri K.N.Agarwal and Saket Agarwal...

Kesumal Vaparmal a Firm and ors. Vs. Bhagwandas Bhojraj

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1976MP123

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Agarwal, Adv.

Sen, J. 1. This appeal by the defendants is directed against a judgment of the District Judge, Raipur, dated 25th March, 1975, decreeing the plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 14,365/- on the strength of three...