Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k m naik · Page 1 of about 32 results (0.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 2001

Padmini R. Bijoor and ors. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1)

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR321; (2002)IIILLJ891Bom

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Naik, ;S.F. Rego and ;A.I. Talegaonkar, Advs. and ;Sunita Chavan, Adv. i/b., ;Bhaishankar Kanga Girdharlal, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. This petition has been filed by one Capt. R.M. Bijoor, the original petitioner, to challenge the order dated December 17, 1986 passed by respondent No. 1 dismissing him from their services. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2015

Saint Gobain Sekurit India Ltd. Vs. Kuyesh Durjan Yadav and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-2015

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith in both the petitions. Respondents waive service. Taken up for final disposal by consent of the parties. 2. The issue involved in both these petitions is, whether it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2001

Sarva Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Crompton Greaves Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Factories Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR380; (2002)ILLJ190Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Colin Gonsalvis, Adv.

R. J. Kochar, J. 1. In its efforts to get butter for the bread of the 120 female workers, the Petitioner Union appears to have caused to disappear the whole loaf of the bread itself. These...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 2003

Shaukat Ali and anr. Vs. Economic Engineering Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR239

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Ganguli and ;K.G. Poojari, Advs.

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.2. The petitioners are challenging the Awards dated 24-3-1999, passed in Reference (IDA) Nos. 493 of 1987 and 685 of 1989 by the Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2001

GaIn Financial Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund C ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employee's Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 7(A)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR55; [2001(90)FLR1096]; (2001)IILLJ1050Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Shri K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., ;M/s Salgaonkar and Co.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioners have challenged three orders passed by the respondent. Provident Fund Commissioner, dated 16th April, 1992, 4th July, 1995 and 13th October, 1995. The order dated 16th April, 1992 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1999

Tata Consulting Engineers Vs. A.C. Doshi and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-15-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 10(1), 12(5), 20, 27 and 28; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR93; 1999(4)BomCR470; (1999)3BOMLR421; (2000)ILLJ318Bom; 1999(3)MhLj334

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b ;Salgaonkar & Co.

ORDERA.P. Shah, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 24th August, 1995, made in Complaint U.L.P. No. 76 of 1986, a proceedings under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2001

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Adil K. Patel

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : (2002)IILLJ383Bom

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Naik, Adv. i/b., ;Salgaonkar & Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal was admitted by the Division Bench of this Court on June 22, 1994 by the following order:CORAM : H.H. KANTHARJA and A.P. SHAH, JJ: Appellant Nos. 1 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2008

Nrk House Vs. P.V. Tommy C/O. Akhil Bhartiya General Kamgar Union and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR540]; (2009)ILLJ582Bom; 2009(2)MhLj358

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Naik and ;S.P. Salkar, Advs.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner-employer has challenged the award dated July 30, 2005 passed by the 1st Labour Court, Mumbai, in Reference (IDA) No. 288 of 2003 directing that the respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1997

Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. A.V. Aradhya and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)

Reported in : [1998(79)FLR44]

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., ;M/s. Salgaonkar and Co.

Patankar, J.1. Rule. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 waives service the Respondent No. 2 is a formal party. By consent Rule made returnable and heard forthwith. 3. This Petition is directed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2005

Tata Infomedia Limited Vs. Tata Press Employees' Union and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 11A; Evidence Act; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR559; [2006(108)FLR890]; 2005(3)MhLj105

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., Sanjay Dhulapkar, Adv.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This petition arises out of an order passed by the Labour Court at Mumbai on 23rd October, 2001 in a reference to adjudication by which the enquiry in a disciplinary proceeding was held...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial