Advanced Search Results
Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu
Karnataka
Jul-03-2009
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11
ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239
G.R. Mohan Adv.
ORDERA.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 2(c)(iii) and 12 read with Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ('the Act' for short), to initiate Criminal Contempt of Court proceedings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bommakkal and ors.
Chennai
Feb-13-1998
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 103A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 157
2000ACJ1500; [1998]94CompCas819(Mad)
K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. New India Insurance Company Limited has filed the above review application under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order made in C.M.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaurav Toshniwal Vs. Best and Crompton Engineering
Company Law Board CLB
Nov-24-2003
MRTP
(2004)120CompCas451
1. The debenture-holder in M/s. Best & Crompton Engineering Limited ("the Company") has made this application under Section 117C of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") submitting that the Company has failed to redeem the debentures...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A.B. Palani Vs. K.P. Ramaswami Mudaliar and Co., by K.P. Kolandiappa M ...
Chennai
Feb-17-1960
Civil
(1960)2MLJ361
Rajamannar, C.J.1. These two appeals arise out of a petition filed by one K.P. Ramaswami Mudaliar & Co., the contesting respondent before us, to adjudicate Venkataramanjulu Chetty insolvent. The petition was filed on 27th March, 1958....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelphine Ann Mascarenhas Vs. MervyIn J.A. Menezes and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-12-2001
FamilyProperty
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 88, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130 and 131; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 111
ILR2001KAR4883; 2001(6)KarLJ81
Udaya Holla, Adv.
1. This is plaintiff's first appeal. In this appeal, the appellant has called in question the correctness of the judgment and decree dated 29th August, 1994 made in O.S. No. 61 of 1992 by the Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHajee Mahomed Abdul Rahman Vs. Tajunnissa Begum and anr.
Chennai
Sep-03-1952
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151
AIR1953Mad420; (1952)2MLJ846
K. Rajah Ayyar and ;K. Kuppuswami, Advs.
1. This is an appeal'against the order of Panchapakesa Aiyar J. directing the appellant to pay to respondent 1 a sum of Rs. 500 by way of interim maintenance pending the disposal of a suit on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBysani Kamalamma Vs. Syed Ismail Ispahani E. Venkata Sastri
Chennai
Feb-16-1951
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rule 4; Madras High Court Original Side Rules - Order 1, Rule 3 - Order 7, Rule 4
AIR1951Mad895; (1951)IMLJ676
K. Kuppuswami, Adv.
Rajamannar, C.J.1. The only question which arises in this appeal is whether Order 37, Rule 4, Civil P. C. (hereinafter referred to as the Code) applies to the original side of this Ct. The resp. filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakunthala and Vs. Viramani,
Chennai
Mar-25-2010
Motor Vehicles
K. Kuppuswamy, Adv.
C.S. Karnan, J.1. The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellants/petitioners against the Award and Decree, dated 03.01.2005, made in M.C.O.P. No. 1182 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Tamilnadu Asbestos (Pipes)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-04-2001
Service Tax
1. This is a departmental appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Trichy, against M/s Tamilnadu Asbestos (Pipes) the respondents herein on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy has allowed the appeal of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.M. Mohan Kumar and ors. Vs. Karnataka Slum Clearance Board and ors.
Karnataka
Jan-23-2006
Civil
Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 - Sections 37(3), 38 and 71; Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961; Karnataka Slum Clearance Board Services (Cadre and Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules, 1999 - Rules 4, 4E and 6; Draft Rules, 1997; Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 - Rule 419; Karnataka Civil Services (Service and Kannada Language) Examinations Rules, 1974 - Rule 2(3) and Rule 2(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227
2006(2)KarLJ90
P.S. Rajagopal, Adv.
ORDERB.S. Patil, J.1. Four employees of the Karnataka Slum Clearance Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board'), who are presently working as Assistant Executive Engineers are before this Court challenging the order dated 29-9-2004 issued by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »