Advanced Search Results
Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate Vs. N.P.V. Ramasamy Udayar
Chennai
Apr-23-1996
CompanyCriminal
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 9(1), 59, 59(1), 71 and 72
[1999]95CompCas202(Mad); 1997CriLJ412
K. Kumar, Adv.
Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. These appeals have been filed in this court by the Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Madras, challenging the acquittal of the respondent in respect of the offences under sections 9(1)(c), 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(d) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnforcement Directorate, Madras Vs. N.P.V. Ramasamy Udayar
Chennai
Apr-23-1996
FERA
1997(89)ELT679(Mad)
Shri K. Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor
1. These appeals have been filed in this Court by the Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Madras, challenging the acquittal of the respondent in respect of the offences under Sections 9(1)(c), 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(d) of the Foreign...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and the Commissioner of C ...
Chennai
Dec-23-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 40; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 14, Rule 2 (2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 227
2006(203)ELT193(Mad)
K. Kumar, Senior Advocate for ;M. Dhandapani, Addl. Central Govt., Standing counsel in C.R.P. No. 4128 and 4138/2001, ;R. Santhanam, Senior Central Govt. Standing counsel in C.R.P. Nos. 4113/2001 an
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. In all the Civil Revision Petitions, the petitioners are Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Finance, Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai. The issue raised in all these petitions is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India V ...
Chennai
Jan-09-2003
FERA
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 9(1), 29, 37, 44(2), 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 56, 56(1), 57, 58(1), 61 and 61(2); Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 49(4); Evidence Act - Sections 24; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 12(2), 17, 18A, 23, 23(1), 23(3), 23D and 23D(1); Customs Act - Sections 107 and 108; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25 and 225; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 77(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3), 21, 22, 26(3) and 311; Customs Duty Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 164, 173 and 464(2)
[2005]126CompCas83(Mad); 2003CriLJ3468; [2005]63SCL248(Mad)
K. Kumar, Spl. Counsel
ORDER) AND OTHERS reported in 1983 TLNJ 422.13.3.14. A prolonged custody is a question of fact and there cannot be any hard and fast rule to decide such allegations except to get satisfied by the scrutinisation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShi Yang @ Sunny Vs. A. Kannagi
Chennai
Oct-04-2007
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 141; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 56; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 141, 276C and 278B; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 319
2008CriLJ617
K. Kumar, Sr. Counsel for ;Anand, Abdul and Vonodh Associates
ORDERS. Palanivelu, J.1. This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No. 381 of 2006, pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No. V, Salem, against the petitioner and to quash the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Director of Enforcement Vs. A.M. Ceaser
Chennai
Mar-10-1998
CustomsCriminal
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8, 8(1), 9, 9(1), 40, 40(3) and 56(1); Evidence Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)
1999(113)ELT804(Mad)
K. Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor
V. Rengasamy, J.1. This appeal is against the reversing judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madras, in C.A. No. 564 of 1987 for the offences under Sections 8(1) read with Section 56(1)(i)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Anbalagan and Seema Aallolam
Chennai
Aug-05-2009
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 14(2)
(2009)8MLJ1225
K. Kumar, Adv.
S. Palanivelu, J.1. In the claim petition, it is stated that on 27.3.2002 at about 10.00 p.m., while the claimant and his friend one Rathinavel were going by a TVS Moped bearing Registration No. Tn 31...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.N.Peruvazhuthi Vs. the Railway Board and ors.
Chennai
Jun-21-2012
Constitution
Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 - Section 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 217, 323A
Mr.K.Kumar, Adv
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the selection of candidates from amongst Advocates, pursuant to notification bearing No.1714/2005 issued by way of Newspaper...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S M/S. Arora Enterprises, Boggulkunta, Hyderabad Vs. the Deputy Comm ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-30-2010
Sales Tax
APGST Act - Sections 20(2), 14(4), 19(1), 21(1)(b)
Sri M.V.J.K. Kumar, Adv.
The order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad (STAT) in A.R. No.38 of 2010 dated 08.02.2010, and the endorsement of the Deputy Commissioner (C.T) dated 29.12.2009 read with the revision order passed by him, under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Sai Madhav Biotech Vs. Warangal Division, Warangal and Another
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-30-2010
Land Acquisition
A.P.V.A.T. Act, 2005 - Section 72
M.V.J.K.Kumar, Adv.
The endorsement of the 1st respondent dated 29.3.2010 is under challenge in this Writ Petition as illegal, arbitrary and ultravires Section 72 of the A.P.V.A.T. Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioner seeks...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »