Advanced Search Results
international Airports Authority Employees Union Vs. International Air ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-2002
Labour and Industrial
International Airports Authority of India Act, 1971; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 - Sections 22; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(5)BomCR43; (2002)IIILLJ277Bom
K.K. Singhvi, ;S.K. Singhvi, ;Ramesh Dubey and ;Susheel Mahadeshar, Advs.
S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the above petitions agreed that the decision in Writ Petition No. 1623 of 1991 will decide the fate of all the above petitions. We...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mishrimal Jethamal Oswal Vs. the Municipal Council of Lonavala, T ...
Mumbai
Aug-08-2006
Civil
Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 2(2), 2(27), 2(38), 2(42), 2(48), 48, 92, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(3), 174, 174(1), 174(2), 174(3), 175, 175(2), 176, 176(6), 179, 180, 185, 189(8), 189(9), 189(10), 189(11), 195(1), 328 and 330; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 26, 30 and 31; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 1(3) and 38; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 7, 30 and 132A; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act - Sections 8; Conveyancing Act, 1881 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 352; Defence of India Ordinance, 1962
2006(6)BomCR715
K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and ;Tannu, ;Mehta-Tiwari, Advs., i/b., ;Aparna Shinde, Adv.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. This writ petition entitled public interest litigation, crystallises three issues for our consideration and decision:(one) Whether the writ petition is in pro bono publico; (two) Whether the disputed pathway and the old bridge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCable Corporation of India Vs. Additional Commissioner of Labour and o ... Overruled
Mumbai
Apr-05-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25N, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25N(2), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25N(3), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25N(6); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Section 10, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Section 25F, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Section 25K to 25S; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Section 25K, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Section 25O, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Section 25R; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Section 25N, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Section 25Q; Constitution of India - Article 19(1), Constitution of India - Article 32, Constitution of India - Article 226
[2005(106)FLR1011]; (2005)IIILLJ691Bom
K.K. Singhvi, Soli Cooper and E. Pereinal, Advs., i/b., R.V. Paranjape, Adv.
A.P. Shah, J.1. The ambit and scope of Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), falls for consideration in this appeal which is directed against the judgment of a learned single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai a Statutory Corporation Cons ...
Mumbai
Mar-27-2006
Property
Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 110, 123, 125, 126, 128, 130, 132, 133, 134, 137, 138, 139 to 144A, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 156 to 166, 166(2), 167, 167(2) and 217; Bombay Rent Control Act - Sections 2(10) and 7; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1); West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 2(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 123(1); Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Calcutta Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 168; Rent Restriction Act; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction Control) Act; Calcutta Munici
2006(3)ALLMR338; 2006(3)BomCR557
K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., ;Birenra Saraf and ;V.K. Khatu, Advs.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its functionaries have preferred this appeal aggrieved by the judgment and order dated October 14, 2004, passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned single Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmpire Industries Ltd. (Garlick Engineering Division) a Company Incorp ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9A, 10(1), 10(3) and 25N; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules
2005(5)BomCR308; (2005)IIILLJ313Bom
K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and ;K.M. Naik, Adv.
D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.2.2001 rendered by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Writ Petition No. 6051 of 1995, filed against the order dated 23.9.1992...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBiddle Sawyer Ltd. Vs. Chemical Employees Union and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-11-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - SectionS 2, 25FFF, 25K and 25O
2007(3)BomCR586; (2007)109BOMLR823; [2007(114)FLR496]; 2007(5)MhLj618
P.K. Rele, Sr. Adv., ;Nutan Patankar, ;R.P. Rele and ;Piyush Shah, Advs.;K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., ;Sanjay Singhvi, ;Bennet D'Souza and ;K.S. Bapat, Advs.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The present petition had been referred to us by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice with regard to a dispute about the interpretation of Section 2(cc) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The dispute arises...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStandard Chartered Bank Ltd. Vs. Grindlays Bank Employees Union and an ...
Mumbai
Feb-11-2003
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10
[2003(97)FLR760]; (2003)IILLJ512Bom
K.K. Singhvi and ;Sudhir Talsania, Advs., i/b., ;Sanjay Udehsi & Co.
D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This petition is directed against the award dated October 29, 2002, passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, Mumbai, in Reference bearing no. CGIT- 2/49 of 2001. The dispute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCable Corporation of India Vs. Additional Commissioner of Labour and o ... Overruled
Mumbai
Apr-05-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N, 25N(2), 25N(3) and 25N(6); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 10, 25F and 25K to 25S; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 25K, 25O and 25R; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 25N and 25Q; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32 and 226
[2005(106)FLR1011]; (2005)IIILLJ691Bom
K.K. Singhvi, ;Soli Cooper and ;E. Pereinal, Advs., i/b., ;R.V. Paranjape, Adv.
A.P. Shah, J.1. The ambit and scope of Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), falls for consideration in this appeal which is directed against the judgment of a learned single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajashri Yeshwant Jadhav and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-30-1983
Constitution
Medical colleges Government of Maharashtra Rules, 1983 - Rule 6B and 4C ; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 226
AIR1985Bom31; ILR1985Bom356
S.P.Thorat,;Avinash Shivade,;V.B. Rairikar,;K.K. Singhvi,;K.H. Chopra,;N.H. Gursahani,;Narendra V. Walawalkar, Advs.
Dharmadhikari, J.1. In all these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged R.6 of the Medical Colleges of the Government of Maharashtra Rules for Admission 1983-84 (hereinafter called the Admission Rules) on the ground that the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Municipal Corporation and anr. Vs. Daily Taj Private Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-01-2001
Commercial
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217; Telegraph Rules - Rules 452, 453, 457 and 458
AIR2001Bom263; 2001(2)ALLMR629; 2001(3)BomCR715; (2001)2BOMLR1007; 2001(3)MhLj21
Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., ;Mr. J. Reis, ;Ms. S.J. Billimoria and ;Ms. Vidhya Khatu ;for Mr. N.V. Matai, Advs.
ORDERR. M. Lodha, J. 1. This first appeal is at the instance of Bombay Municipal Corporation and the Assessor and Collector, aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 17th April, 2000 passed by the Additional Chief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »