Advanced Search Results

M. Padmapriya and Others Vs. The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the...

Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar, Through its Commissioner ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment:- 1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. Since the issue involved in all these matters is identical, the petitioner is the same Municipal Corporation and since all the respondents are identically placed...

B. Panneer Selvam Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Mohammed Imran for M/s. Ajmal Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: T.S. Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader.

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the...

Jose A. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 162; Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules; Kerala State Industries Services Rules

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ547; 2008(3)KLT677

Advocate for Appellant : Elvin Peter P.J. and; Deepu Thankan, Advs.

V. Giri, J.1. Common issues arise for consideration in these two writ petitions and therefore they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. WP(C) No. 31047/2007 is taken as the...

Dashrath and Others Vs. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (B. R. Gavai, J) : 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. The petitioners, who are employees in Group D on the establishment of Respondent No.1, have approached this Court praying for...

Central Coalfields Limited Through the Chairman Cum Managing Directors ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 F.A. NO. 64 OF2007WITH W.P.(C) NO. 4492 OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. NO. 64 OF20071. Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Post - Ranchi, Police Station - Ranchi, District - Ranchi.2. The...

R. Narayanan and S.R. Tainguria Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(1)MPHT77(CG)

ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Since the relief(s) claimed in both the petitions are identical, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. The brief facts are that on the date of filing of the...

Jackson Paul, vs Regional Passport Officer,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 2440 OF 2024 PETITIONER: JACKSON PAUL, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O AKKARAKKARAN...

Prem Matiyani, Director, Song and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. tue of this OA applicant, who has been functioning as a Director in Song and Drama Division, has assailed respondents order dated 26.12.2003, received by him on 4.1.2004, whereby his claim for upgradation of post...

Abdul Jabbar and ors. Vs. 2nd Additional District Judge, Orai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 85; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Uttar Pradesh Provincial Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1980All369

Advocate for Appellant : Rajeshji Verma, ;R. Dwivedi and ;P.K. Biswas, Advs.

A.N. Verma, J.1. These are two connected petitions arising out of two suits filed by the plaintiffs-respondents against the petitioners in each of the two petitions for the eviction of the petitioners.2. The relevant facts are...