Advanced Search Results

Chandrakant S/O Ganpatrao Ghuse Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 2(7), 2(49), 55 and 55(5)

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR528

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Sr.C.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri K.H. Deshpande, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.R. Gavai, learned Government Pleader for respondents.2. Rule, made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.3. The petitioner...

Ratanlal Biharilal Atal and anr. Vs. Amravati Municipal Corporation an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR568; 2002(4)BomCR123

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Sr. C.

V.M. Kande, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the sanction of plan granted by the respondents 1 to 5 to respondent No. 6 for construction of a commercial complex (four storeyed) i.e. basement, ground plus...

Rashtriya Sut Girni Mazdoor Sangh, Amravati Vs. Government of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Textile Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 - Sections 3, 9 and 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR339; [2002(92)FLR927]; 2002(2)MhLj448

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Thakur, Adv. in W.P. No. 1335 of 1997 and ;K.H. Deshpande, Adv. in W.P. No. 1402 of 1997

R.M. Lodha, J.1. These two writ petitions pertain to the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge under the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960. As the learned Single Judge could not take up these matters...

Dr. Sanjay G. Khemuka Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Nagpur Municipal Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 286; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 53(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2004Bom245; 2004(3)ALLMR687

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Sr. Adv. assisted by ;Z.A. Haq, ;S.S. Adkar and ;R.J. Mirza, Advs., ;Sunil Manohar, ;B.G. Kulkarni, ;J.A. Vera, ;A.C. Dharmadhikari, ;R.V. Shiralkar, ;R.H. Udeshi, ;S.V. Akolkar and ;D

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Dr. Sanjay G. Khemuka, Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4278 of 2003, has filed the present writ petition...

Smt. Maya D/O Hariharrao Deshpande Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj865

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Sr. Adv. and ;U.N. Andhare, Adv.

A.H. Joshi, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent.2. Facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows:[a] Petitioner got employment and 3rd joined with respondent No. 2 on July, 1973, and...

Bhaskar S/O Govind Deshpande (Since Deceased) by L.Rs. Smt. Wasundhara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR57; 1988MhLJ409

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal filed by a tenant arises out of proceedings for permission to terminate his tenancy under Clause 13(3)(ii) & (vi) of the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent...

Madhukar Trimbakrao Ghisad Vs. Malti Madhukar Ghisad and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 21, 24 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 28

Reported in : AIR1973Bom141; (1973)75BOMLR311; ILR1973Bom1003; 1973MhLJ204

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Adv.

Chandurkar, J.1. The question which is referred to the Division Bench by Gatne J. is whether an order made under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is appealable or can only be challenged in...

Prabhakar Manoharrao Deshpande Vs. Appropriate Authority

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UC, 269UD, 269UD(1); Income Tax Rules - Rule 48I

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(Bom)270; [2004]266ITR292(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande and ;Purohit, Advs.

ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. The petitioners have approached this Court challenging the order dt. 24th Feb., 1995 passed in case No. AHD/AA/NAG-241/1994-95 by respondent No. 1, the Appropriate Authority, IT Department under Section 269UD(1) of the IT...

Vidarbha Metallica Vs. First Labour Court and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5 and 27

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR167]; (1993)IIILLJ554Bom

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Deshpande, Adv.

H.D. PateI, J. 1. The above petitions arise as a consequence of two contradictory findings on the same matter in the same establishment in respect of the workmen employed at the same place by the two...

Dr. D.K. Belsare Vs. Nagpur University

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR494

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Oka

Deshpande, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of respondent No. 3 by the Nagpur University, the respondent No. 1 to the Post of professor of Zoology in the University...