Advanced Search Results

Shreeram Mills Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8, 8(1) and 9(A); Central Excise Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT457(Bom); [1982]138ITR823a(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.H. Bhabha

1. The petitioner-company Shreeram Mills Limited (hereinafter the company) is having three separate departments consisting of spinning, weaving and processing departments respectively. In the spinning department yarn is manufactured which yarn intended to be used for...

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Off-shore Enterprises Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 28, 30, 33 and 35; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR538; (1994)96BOMLR277

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Paranjape and ;M.V. Shah, Advs. and ;C. Ragavayya, ;H.P. Patel and ;K.M. Mody, Advs., i/b. Desai and Diwanji

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. Both these appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 20th/23rd April, 1992 of the Learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No. 210 of 1989 by which the petition has been...

Perma Container (Uk) Line Limited and Another Vs. Perma Container Line ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Petitioners in Arbitration Petition No. 259 of 2013 are the original claimants in the arbitration proceedings and seek a declaration that the arbitration award dated 30th January, 2013 is enforceable as a decree of this...

Padmakar Balkrishna Samant and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Maharashtra Cement (Licensing and Control) Order, 1973; Representation of the People Act

Reported in : AIR1981Bom422

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai,;N.H. Seervai and;D.N. Nanavati, Advs.

ORDER1. Questions of considerable public importance are raised in this public interest action initiated under Article 226 of the Constitution by three citizens, one of whom is a former member of the country's sovereign legislative body,...

Dr. Indramani Pyarelal Gupta Vs. W.R. Nathu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Forward Markets Regulation Act, 1952; Essential Commodities Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1963SC274; (1963)65BOMLR378; [1963]1SCR721

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pathak

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 109 of 1957. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 1, 1956, of the Bombay High Court in Appeal No. 20 of 1956. G. S. Pathak,...

Union of India and anr. Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17(1), 293(1), 370, 391 and 394; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 3, 20, 20(1), 21, 21(1), 22, 22(1), 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 23(4), 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 48(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22

Reported in : [1972]42CompCas72(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Bhabha, Adv.

Mody, J. 1. These are two appeals by the Union of India and the Regional Director, Company Law Board, Western Region, Bombay, against a common judgment but two separate orders passed in Company Petitions Nos. 159...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. A-1 Engineering Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 16(4), 34(1), 34(3), 48(2), 49(1) and 50(2)

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Bom)485; [1976]37STC608(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Bhabha, Adv.

Kania, J.1. This is a reference purported to be made, under section 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax....

Shripatrao Dajisaheb Ghatge and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Aritcles 32, 32(1), 32(2), 132, 133, 136(1), 225, 226, 227, 227(1), 227(2), 227(3), 227(4), 227(5), 323A, 323A(3), 323B, 323B(3), 323B(4) and 359(1); Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 58; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 88(1) and 88C; Land Acquisition Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; General Clauses Act, 1897; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 224 and 224(2); Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 107; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Bombay Civil Courts Act; Presidency and Provincial Small Cause Courts Act; Bombay City Civil Court Act; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act; Motor Vehicles Act,

Reported in : AIR1977Bom384; (1977)79BOMLR259; 1977MhLJ406

Advocate for Appellant : A.V.K. Mudaliar, Adv. for the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, ;R.W. Adik, Adv. General as per notice, ;M.V. Paranjpe, ;V.D. Govilkar, ;Sidhwa, ;K.H. Bhabha and ;V.P. Tipnis, Advs. as Interveners on beha

Tulzapurkar, Actg. C.J. 1. These four petitions have been placed before this larger bench with a view to ascertain the impact of Article 227 of the Constitution as amended by the Constitution (42 Amendment) Act, 1976...

The Union of India and anr. Vs. Tata Engineering, Locomotive Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2 and 23(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Bom301; (1972)74BOMLR1; ILR1972Bom228

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Bhabha and ;P.M. Mukhi, Advs.

Mody, J.1. These are two appeals by the Union of India and the Regional Director, Company Law Board, Western Region, Bombay, against a common Judgment but two separate orders passed in Company Petitions Nos. 159 of...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Modern Mercantile Works

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 16(4); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 7, 77(1) and 77(3); Bombay Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 19(1), 34, 76 and 77

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Bom)372

Advocate for Appellant : K.H. Bhabha, Adv.

Madon, J. 1. This Reference under section 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, has been made at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax. The Respondent firm, which is the assessee in this...