Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k govindarajan · Page 1 of about 477 results (0.202 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 28 1994

Raja Palyam Paruthi Panchu Sangam and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1989 - Sections 2(1), Schedule 1, Item 4, Entry 15, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24(1), 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 49, 52, 57, 59 and 63; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 286, 301 and 304; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1991 - Rules 27, 30, 32, 33 and 41(2); Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987; Madras Commercial Crops Act, 1933; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1965 - Setion 17; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live-stock) Markets Act, 1966; Tamil Nadu Act, 1959 - Sections 18; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 19

Reported in : AIR1996Mad29

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramanian for;M/s. K. Govindarajan and;S. Kadarkarai, Adv.,;R. Rajasekaran,;P. Selvaraj,;G. Subramanian for;M/s. S. Subbiah T. Mathivammal, Advs.,;J. Venkataraja,;Poppin Fernando,;Vijay Narayan S

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. In all these writ petitions the petitioners are dealers engaged in purchase and sale of various agricultural produces and they challenge the various provisions of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1996

R. Abdul Jabbar and 5 ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and 4 ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-14-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC719; (1997)IMLJ264

Advocate for Appellant : K. Govindarajan, Adv. for ;Selvaraj, Adv.

ORDERShivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners in this writ petition have sought a writ of certiorearified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1995

K. Jasmine Kirubakani Vs. K. Balasundaram

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-1995

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18 and 19; Lunancy Act, 1912 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 62 and 51; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1996Mad105; I(1996)DMC456; (1995)IIMLJ418

Advocate for Appellant : K. Govindarajan, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition coining on for hearing on Friday, the twenty fourth day of February, 1995, upon perusing the petition, the order of the Court below and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K. Govinda-rajan. Advocate,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2012

Thangavel Vs. Kanagaraj and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Aug-02-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: K. Govindarajan, Advocate. For the Respondent: R1 to R7 - B. Saravanan, E.K. Kumaresan, Advocates.

(Prayer: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order dated 14.3.2012 made in IA.Nos.94 and 95/2012 in OS.No.521/2010 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur.) ORDER 1. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1994

N.K. Mehaet Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 288 and 288(5) and (6); Income Tax Rules, 1961 - Rules 59 to 65

Reported in : [1994]208ITR563(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Govindarajan, Adv.

Raju, J. 1. By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal when the petition for injunction with the vacating injunction petition filed by the Department, came up...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2002

C.A. Abraham Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-21-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Mad)34

Advocate for Appellant : K Rajagopal, for the Assessee C. V. Rajan, for the Revenue

K. Govindarajan, J.A search was conducted in the residential premises of Shri C.A. Abraham (SR) on 14-12-1995. During the course of search, the officials had seized certain indiscriminating documents revealing the investments made by him in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2026

ADRPLEXUS Medical Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs Vivekandan,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI AND CMP No.5640 of 2026 ADRPLEXUS Medical Services Pvt Ltd Rep. by its Authorised Signatory No.431, 23rd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2026

Union of India vs the Registrar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI AND WMP No.10853 of 2024 Union of India Rep.by the Chairman Railway Recruitment Board, Chennai No.5 Dr.P.V.Cherian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2013

St.Thomas Silver Jubilee Matriculation School Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 03.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition No.4949 of 2013 St. Thomas Silver Jubilee Matriculation School, 1799, 3rd Main...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1979

C. Muthu Bhattar Vs. the Authorised Officer (Land Reforms)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1979

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1979)1MLJ480

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ratnam

ORDERP.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.1. One Muthu Bhattar has filed this revision petition under Section 83 of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act (LVIII of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as the Ceiling Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial