Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k g raghavan · Page 1 of about 673 results (0.369 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2011

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/S. Leela Scottish Lace Ltd and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-18-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Raveendran, Addl. Solicitor General along with N.R. Bhaskar, Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel and K.N. Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Naresh Thacker, Adv A/w, Ajay J.N., Adv for M/s. K G Raghavan Assts, Advocates.

(Prayer: These tax referred cases are referred by the Assistant Registrar, Customs, Excise and Service Tax, Appellate Tribunal U/s. 130A of Customs Act, in Appeal No. C/105/02, No. C/161,162/02 and No. C/166/02 for the opinion of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2007

The Academy of General Education Represented by the Registrar Sri K.K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 40 and 41; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan, Adv. for ;K. Sachindra Karanth, Adv.

V. Jagannathan, J.1. A flower is inseparable from its fragrance. Waves do not exist without the sea. There cannot be 'night' without the day. 'Creation' does not exclude its creator. 'YAKSHAGANA' cannot be thought of without...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1986

B.S. Kamath and Co. and ors Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-1986

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 12(1), 14, 14(1), 15, 25, 46, 50, 157 and 157(2)

Reported in : 1986(8)ECC92; 1986(24)ELT456(Kar); ILR1986KAR3895

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Shevgoor and ;K.G. Raghavan, Advs.

K.S. Puttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by Hakeem, J. these cases were posted before us for disposal. 2. As common questions of law arise for determination in these cases, we propose to dispose of them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 13 2003

In Re: Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-13-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 177, 391, 391(1), 391(2) and 392; Banking Regulations Act, 1949 - Sections 19(2); Trade Marks Act, 1999

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas413(Kar); (2003)4CompLJ13(Karn); [2003]43SCL186(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan, Adv. for ICICI, ;Udaya Holla, Adv. for Objector Cauvery Gears Pvt. Ltd., ;R.B. Deshpande, Adv. for Objector R.P. Enterprises, ;Vishwanath Shendge, ACGSC for ROC and ;Samarthana Associat

ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. Company Petition No. 97/2002 is filed by Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd. to obtain sanction of this Court to the scheme of arrangement whereby the Company may be restructured by addressing its weaknesses and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2009

Sap India Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003; Finance Act, 1994; Karnataka Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 245, 246 and 366

Reported in : (2009)23VST276(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan, Sr. Counsel for Vasan Associates and ;Darius B. Shroff, Sr. Counsel for A. Rama Venkatesh Vikram, ;Alur and ;Harish V.S., Advs. for Harish and Co.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. All these writ petitions are by the assessee under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 who have been assessed to certain tax liability under the provisions of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2011

Ferrostaal A. G. Vs. Bharati Shipyard Limited and State Bank of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-19-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 1996 - Section 9, 11(6), 44, Article 33, 34 and 35 ; ICC Rules; London Maritime Arbitrators' Association (LMAA) Rules ;

Advocate for Appellant : Sri K.G. Raghavan; Amarchand; Mangaidas; Suresh A Shroof, Advs

1. These appeals are filed against the judgment and order dated 14.1,2011 passed in AA.Nos.6/2010 7/2010 by the District Judge, Dakshina Kannda, Mangalore. 2, The facts in brief are as under:- Appellant is a company incorporated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2003

Bangalore Bullion Traders Vs. Minerals and Metal Trading Corporation L ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ555

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan, Adv. for Dua Associates

1. Writ Appeal Nos. 5569 and 5822 of 1999 are preferred against the common judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 2nd July, 1999 in W.P. Nos. 12031 and 12028 of 1999, whereas, W.A. No. 6541...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1981

Vonti Chennappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-28-1981

Subject : Contract

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 9-A; Representation of the People Act; Karnataka Forest Act; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rule 88(2)

Reported in : ILR1981KAR1305

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan, Adv.

ORDER1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the auction sale of minor forest produce in respect of Tupra leaves of Sandur Firka and minor forest produce of Hospet taluk.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1985

Prime Publicity Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-03-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1610

Advocate for Appellant : V. Tarakaram and ;K.G. Raghavan, Advs.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In all these Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners have sought for quashing the communication dated 3-5-1985 issued by the 2nd respondent informing the petitioners that the bids...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2003

Fr. Muller's Hospital, Rep. by Its Director Vs. the Member Secretary a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-16-2003

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 6, 8, 12, 15, 25 and 25(2); ;Bio Medical Waste - (Management And Handling) Rules, 1998 - Rule 8(3)

Reported in : AIR2004Kant342; ILR2003KAR5116

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Raghavan and ;R.V. Hadagali, Advs. of ;Dua Associates

ORDERShylendra Kumar, J.1. Petitioners in the above Writ Petitions are either hospitals or Nursing Homes wherein health services are provided. Petitioners are charging for such services. In the course of their activities petitioners produce waste which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial