Advanced Search Results
S. Indrakumari Vs. S. Subbaiah
Chennai
Jan-10-2003
FamilyCivil
Family Courts Act - Sections 19
2003(1)CTC259; I(2003)DMC668; (2003)2MLJ148
K. Doraisami, Sr. Counsel for ;K.N. Nataraj, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order of the Principal Family Court, Madras dated 13.08.2002 made in F.C.O.P. No. 390 of 1995 granting divorce, the wife has filed the above appeal. 2. The husband has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Padmavathy, 11, 1st Floor, East Spurtank Road, Chennai-31 and Other ...
Chennai
Apr-19-1999
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1984 -- Sections 4(1), 5, 6, 9(3), 10 and 17; Amendment Act, 1984 -- Sections 17; Constitution of India -- Articles 14 and 19
1999(2)CTC323
Mr. David Thiagaraj, ;Mr. A.J. Abdul Razak, ;Mr. J.R.K. Bhavanantham, ;Mr. R.S. Jeevarethinam, ;Mr. P. Subba Reddy, ;Mr.K. Doraisamy, Senior Counsel for ;M/s. Muthumani Doraisamy Advs.
ORDER1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions are the owners of the lands acquired by the respondents for the establishment of the industrial complex. They have filed these writ petitions, challenging the acquisition of their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.A. Duraisamy and P.D. Chockalingam Vs. the Government of Tamilnadu R ...
Chennai
Oct-15-2008
Media and Communication
Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act, 1984 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21, 22 and 33; Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Rules, 1984; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 113; Bombay City Police Act; Bombay City Police Rules - Rule 7; Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Ordinance, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)
(2009)1MLJ755
K. Doraisami, Sr.counsel for Kandanl Doraisami, Adv.
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Mr. K. Doraisami, learned Senior Counsel leading Mr. Kandan Doraisami and Mr.A.Arumugam, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents and perused the records.2. Both the writ petitioners challenges the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pachaiyammal Educational Trust. Vs. the Appellate Committee and ors.
Chennai
Jul-12-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226
Mr.K.Doraisamy, Adv.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the orders of the 2nd respondent in F.No. 732-52-001 (NDEG).ET/97 dated 12.4.2012 addressed to the Principal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Leigh Bazaar Merchants Association Ltd. Rep. by Its Secretary, A. ...
Chennai
Jun-10-2008
Trusts and Societies
Hindu Religious and Chartiable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 63 and 69(1); Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 6(20) and 9; Evidence Act; Companies Act, 1913
2008(5)MhLj1504
K. Doraisami, Sr. Counsel for ;Muthumani Doraisami, Adv.
S. Tamilvanan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.04.1996 made in O.S. No. 285 of 1996 on the file of the Sub-Court, Salem.2. The appellants herein were the plaintiffs in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Mohamed Ibrahim, Vs. Mohamed Habibullah
Chennai
Jan-08-2008
LimitationContract
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4 to 24 - Schedule - Articles 47 and 54
(2008)2MLJ589
K. Doraisami, Sr. Counsel for ;Muthumani Doraisami, Adv.
S. Tamilvanan, J.1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 25.10.1994 made in O.S. No. 347 of 1992 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode. The appellants herein were defendants 1,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Gowriyamman Body Builders Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Dec-19-1991
Excise
1992(58)ELT479(Mad)
Shri K. Doraisami, ;Sr. Counsel for M/s Muthumani Doraisami, ;R. Kottravel and ;K. Raja, Advs.
Nainar Sundaram, Acting C.J.1. These writ appeals arise out of the common order made by the learned Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions. The petitioners in the writ petitions are the appellants in these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Aslam and ors. Vs. C.N.A. Gowdhaman
Chennai
Apr-20-2005
CivilProperty
Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 104 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3
2005(2)CTC766; (2005)3MLJ357
K. Doraisamy, Sr. Counsel for ;Muthumani Doraisamy, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. O.S.A.No.44 of 2005 has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 10.03.2005 made in Application No.4607 of 2004, in and by which the learned Judge condoned the delay of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.S.B. Educational Trust Rep. by Its Chairman, V.S Balsamy, Kangeyam, ...
Chennai
Apr-26-2002
Constitution
Trust Act; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 3 and 10
(2002)2MLJ642
K. Doraisamy, Sr. Counsel for Muthumani Doraisamy
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. V.S.B. Educational Trust through its Chairman has approached this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to process their application dated 07.08.2000, for grant of approval to establish V.S.B....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Bharat Enterprises Vs. Airports Authority of India
Chennai
Mar-16-2011
Education
Mr.K. Doraisami; M/s Muthumani Doraisami, Advs.
O R D E R1. Heard Mr.K. Doraisami, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Vijay Narayan, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »