Advanced Search Results
Ramesh Kumar Karnwal Vs. Asstt. Dy. Cit
Allahabad
Feb-09-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]141TAXMAN306(All)
K.K. Tiwari, for the Assessee K.D. Tiwari, for the Revenue
ORDERWe have heard Sri K.K. Tiwari holding brief of Sri K.D. Tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner is a practising Ayurvedic Chikitsak and he had made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeep Tandon, Vs. State of U.P. and Another.
Allahabad
Jul-02-2010
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 420, 463 ; The Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482, 156(3),
Mr. K.D. Tiwari, Adv.
1. This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been moved for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of case no.1231/08, under Section 467, 468, 471, 120-B, IPC, pending before the Additional CJM, 1st, Rampur.2. It appears from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbhinandan Singh Vs. Mahesh Kumar Mishra and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-10-2000
Civil
Advocates Act, 1975 - Sections 35; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rule 39
AIR2001All77
Tej Pal, ;K.D. Tiwari, ;D. Kumar, ;J.S. Sengar and ;R.P.S. Chauhan, Advs.
ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. This petition was dismissed as not pressed on 29-10-99. The petitioner has now moved an application to recall the order dated 29-10-99 and to restore the petition and to decide it on merits....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anuj Gupta (Minor) Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education, Through I ...
Allahabad
Sep-18-2002
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2003)1UPLBEC44
K.D. Tiwari, Adv.
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for following reliefs :-'(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttam Chand Prajapati Vs. Narendra Narayan Bhatnagar and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-05-2007
Tenancy
2007(3)AWC2682
Sri. S.K. Mehrotra
ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Sri S.K. Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Sri K.D. Tiwari learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This revision, under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, has been preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.E.C. Limited and anr. Vs. India Exhibition Management Pvt. Ltd. an ...
Allahabad
May-09-2008
Arbitration
2008(4)AWC3230
Amitava Lala, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs-appellants upon being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Budh Nagar dated 25th April, 2005 in Suit No. 257...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTribhuwan Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Oct-04-2010
Education
1. Case taken up in the revised list. Sri K.D. Tiwari, advocate is present for the revisionist. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is not present. Counter affidavit on behalf of the State has been filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaulat Singh Khati Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F. an ...
Allahabad
Aug-09-2004
Service
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 9, 10, 11, 11(1) and 12 - Rule 11; Central Reserve Police Force Rules - Rule 11
2005(2)AWC1962; 2005(1)ESC513; (2004)3UPLBEC2897
P.C. Srivastava and ;K.D. Tiwari, Advs.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner was recruited as a constable in 1979. In February, 1993 he was posted as a Constable Driver. On 17.3.1993 the petitioner was charge-sheeted on the ground that he was found drunk...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. Through Chief Secretary and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-01-2002
ConstitutionCriminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 8
2003CriLJ218
K.D. Tiwari and ;Vijendra Singh, Advs.
M. Katju, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned detention order dated 9-1-2000 Annexure 1 to the petition, passed under the National Security Act.3. In our opinion this petition deserves...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamji Vs. Commissioner and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-02-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 115S
2003(1)AWC793
S.K. Dwivedi and ;K.D. Tiwari, Advs.
S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel.2. Challenge in this petition is the order passed by the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur, dated 22.11.2002 by which the approval as was given...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »